Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 36 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

A key event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the conversion of the peptide beta-amyloid (Abeta) from its soluble monomeric form into various aggregated morphologies in the brain. Apolipoprotein E (apoE) is known to act as a pathological chaperone of Abeta in this process, promoting its fibril formation from soluble Abeta by binding interaction between carboxy-terminal domain of apoE and residues 12-28 of full-length Abeta. Therefore, blocking apoE/Abeta interaction is being actively pursued as a primary therapeutic strategy for AD. Abeta20-29, a short peptide, contains the residues to competitively bind to apoE and may potentially block the interaction between apoE and full-length Abeta. However, little is known whether Abeta20-29 could block apoE/Abeta interaction to play an effective role in reducing full-length Abeta fibrillization and cytotoxicity. Utilizing fluorescence spectroscopic analysis with thioflavin T and electron microscopic study, we show here that Abeta20-29 alone was non-fibrillogenic, and had no direct effects on Abeta1-42 or Abeta1-40 aggregation. Moreover, apoE can directly promote both Abeta1-42 and Abeta1-40 aggregation and fibril formation, while this promoting effect was inhibited when adding Abeta20-29, with a dose-dependent manner. In the series of cell culture experiments, Abeta20-29 alone shows no cytotoxicity to PC12 cells as demonstrated by MTT assay, while co-incubation apoE isoforms and Abeta1-42 or Abeta1-40 shows stronger cytotoxicity as compared to Abeta1-42 or Abeta1-40 alone. When incubated with Abeta20-29, whereas such strong cytotoxic effect was concentration-dependently reduced. Taken together, we demonstrate for the first time that Abeta20-29 has no direct effect on full-length Abeta aggregation, and may competitively block the binding of full-length Abeta to apoE, resulting in an inhibitory effect on apoE's promoting full-length Abeta fibrillogenesis and Abeta-induced cytotoxicity. Our results raise the possibility that Abeta20-29 peptide blocking the interaction between full-length Abeta and apoE isoforms may be effective as a therapeutic agent for AD.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Hao, J., Zhang, W., Zhang, P., Liu, R., Liu, L., Lei, G., et al. (2010). Abeta20-29 peptide blocking apoE/Abeta interaction reduces full-length Abeta42/40 fibril formation and cytotoxicity in vitro. Neuropeptides. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npep.2010.03.001

Vancouver

Hao J, Zhang W, Zhang P, Liu R, Liu L, Lei G, et al. Abeta20-29 peptide blocking apoE/Abeta interaction reduces full-length Abeta42/40 fibril formation and cytotoxicity in vitro. Neuropeptides. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.npep.2010.03.001. PMID: 20363024.

BibTeX

@article{hao2010-20363024,
  author  = {Hao, J. and Zhang, W. and Zhang, P. and Liu, R. and Liu, L. and Lei, G. and Su, C. and Miao, J. and others},
  title   = {{Abeta20-29 peptide blocking apoE/Abeta interaction reduces full-length Abeta42/40 fibril formation and cytotoxicity in vitro}},
  journal = {Neuropeptides},
  year    = {2010},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.npep.2010.03.001},
  pmid    = {20363024},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npep.2010.03.001}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 36/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 21 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 36 of 100. Total 36 of 100.21 of the 58 points we could judge = 36 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Neuropeptides)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2010 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Laboratory or animal study (title names “in vitro”) — scores zero
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 20363024)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 21 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100.
Total 36 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “abeta”

3 studies in the library carry the topic tag “abeta”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 3 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →