Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 58 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background More than 5.4 million informal caregivers (ICGs) in the United States care for persons with dementia (PWD). Failure of ICGs to incorporate self-care into their routine may lead to adverse health consequences. Caregivers and researchers need to understand the evidence around dementia ICGs' self-care practices. Purpose To synthesize evidence on the self-care needs and behaviors of Alzheimer's and dementia ICGs and its research implications. Methods PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to conduct a systematic review of research. Orem's self-care theory and a concept analysis of self-management behaviors provided a framework for the review. Results Three themes emerged from 29 included studies: self-care needs and behaviors of ICGs, barriers to performing self-care, and enablers of self-care. The self-care needs of dementia ICGs included sleep, social engagement and support, and leisure activities. Self-care behaviors identified by this review were engaging in activities with the PWD, spiritual and religious activities, and taking a break from caregiving. Barriers to self-care were gender roles, self-sacrificing, minority ethnicity, and burden of caregiving. Enabling self-care involved acknowledging personal consequences of caregiving, balancing self-care needs with the PWD's needs, and positioning oneself as an objective/subjective duality. Implications Self-care is a dynamic, challenging aspect to caregiving, but supporting evidence is often limited or cannot be generalized. More studies are needed that include random sampling, heterogeneous samples, and quantitative methods. Additional research is needed to understand how self-care needs, behaviors, and barriers differ by caregiver race/ethnicity, gender, or relationship to the PWD.

Key findings

Why it matters

This systematic review synthesized evidence on the self-care needs and behaviors of informal caregivers of people with dementia, identifying needs such as sleep, social engagement and leisure activities, along with barriers and enablers. It addresses caregiver support rather than treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 58/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 58 of 100.58 of 100 points earned42 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Gerontologist)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 The Gerontologist: journal h-index 238 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2019 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 99 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 11.0 citations a year over 9 year(s) since 2019
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 8 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 46 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Hae‐Ra Han: h-index 52 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Johns Hopkins University: institution h-index 2,306 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 29931147)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 58 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Waligora, K. J., Bahouth, M. N., & Han, H. R. (2019). The Self-Care Needs and Behaviors of Dementia Informal Caregivers: A Systematic Review. The Gerontologist. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny076

Vancouver

Waligora KJ, Bahouth MN, Han HR. The Self-Care Needs and Behaviors of Dementia Informal Caregivers: A Systematic Review. The Gerontologist. 2019. doi:10.1093/geront/gny076. PMID: 29931147.

BibTeX

@article{waligora2019-29931147,
  author  = {Waligora, K. J. and Bahouth, M. N. and Han, H. R.},
  title   = {{The Self-Care Needs and Behaviors of Dementia Informal Caregivers: A Systematic Review}},
  journal = {The Gerontologist},
  year    = {2019},
  doi     = {10.1093/geront/gny076},
  pmid    = {29931147},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny076}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

8 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Disparities

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →