Home › Research › Drug development
The association of antidiabetic medications and Mini-Mental State Examination scores in patients with diabetes and dementia
Secnik J, Xu H, Schwertner E, Hammar N, Alvarsson M, Winblad B, Eriksdotter M, Garcia-Ptacek S et al.. Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2021-12-02
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Background The effect of antidiabetic medication on cognitive function is unclear. We analyzed the association between five antidiabetic drugs and change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores in patients with diabetes and dementia. Methods Using the Swedish Dementia Registry and four supplementary Swedish registers/databases, we identified 1873 patients (4732 observations) with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (diabetes) and Alzheimer's disease or mixed-pathology dementia who were followed up at least once after dementia diagnosis. Use of metformin, insulin, sulfonylurea, thiazolidinediones (TZD), and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) was identified at baseline. Prevalent-user, incident-user, and drug-drug cohorts were sampled, and propensity-score matching was used to analyze comparable subjects. Beta coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CI) from the random intercept and slope linear mixed-effects models determined the association between the use of antidiabetic medications and decline in MMSE score points between the follow-ups. Inverse-probability weighting was used to account for patient dropout. Results Compared to non-users, prevalent users of metformin (beta 0.89, 95% CI 0.44; 1.33) and DPP-4i (0.72, 0.06; 1.37) experienced a slower cognitive decline with time. Secondly, compared to DPP-4i, the use of insulin (-1.00, -1.95; -0.04) and sulfonylureas (-1.19; -2.33; -0.04) was associated with larger point-wise decrements in MMSE with annual intervals. Conclusions In this large cohort of patients with diabetes and dementia, the use of metformin and DPP-4i was associated with a slower decline in MMSE scores. Further examination of the cognitive effects of metformin and incretin-based medications is warranted.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Secnik, J., Xu, H., Schwertner, E., Hammar, N., Alvarsson, M., Winblad, B., et al. (2021). The association of antidiabetic medications and Mini-Mental State Examination scores in patients with diabetes and dementia. Alzheimer's research & therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00934-0
Vancouver
Secnik J, Xu H, Schwertner E, Hammar N, Alvarsson M, Winblad B, et al. The association of antidiabetic medications and Mini-Mental State Examination scores in patients with diabetes and dementia. Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2021. doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00934-0. PMID: 34857046.
BibTeX
@article{secnik2021-34857046,
author = {Secnik, J. and Xu, H. and Schwertner, E. and Hammar, N. and Alvarsson, M. and Winblad, B. and Eriksdotter, M. and Garcia-Ptacek, S. and others},
title = {{The association of antidiabetic medications and Mini-Mental State Examination scores in patients with diabetes and dementia}},
journal = {Alzheimer's research \& therapy},
year = {2021},
doi = {10.1186/s13195-021-00934-0},
pmid = {34857046},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-021-00934-0}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results Compared to non-users, prevalent users of metformin (beta 0.89, 95% CI 0.44; 1.33) and DPP-4i (0.72, 0.06; 1.37) experienced a slower cognitive decline with time.
- Secondly, compared to DPP-4i, the use of insulin (-1.00, -1.95; -0.04) and sulfonylureas (-1.19; -2.33; -0.04) was associated with larger point-wise decrements in MMSE with annual intervals.
- Conclusions In this large cohort of patients with diabetes and dementia, the use of metformin and DPP-4i was associated with a slower decline in MMSE scores.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Participants1,873
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 57/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 33 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 57 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer's research & therapy) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 3 / 5 | 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 3 / 4 | 1,873 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 34857046) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 33 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 33 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 57 out of 100. |
| Total | 57 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.