Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 58 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Of the 62 caregivers approached, 60 enrolled (96.7%), and 54 completed the study (90% retention). Assessment completion rates were 96.7% immediately after the intervention and 93.1% at the 3-month follow-up. Over 85% of participants were engaged weekly, and all participants rated the program content positively. Acceptability was high, with more than 89% expressing satisfaction with the content, format, and duration. Preliminary findings indicated improvements in psychological distress, dementia knowledge, caregiver burden, and quality of life. This is the first study in Vietnam to evaluate a smartphone-based psychoeducational intervention for caregivers of PwD. The program was feasible, well-accepted, and showed potential benefits. It offers a promising, scalable support model for caregivers in resource-limited settings and warrants further investigation in a larger trial.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Nguyen, T. T. T., Vu, L. D. T., Truong, K. T., Nguyen, T. C., Thai, T. T., Schofield, P. E., et al. (2025). Smartphone App-Based Psychoeducation for Caregivers of People with Dementia in Vietnam: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Interventions in Aging. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s551994

Vancouver

Nguyen TTT, Vu LDT, Truong KT, Nguyen TC, Thai TT, Schofield PE, et al. Smartphone App-Based Psychoeducation for Caregivers of People with Dementia in Vietnam: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2025. doi:10.2147/cia.s551994. PMID: 41000210.

BibTeX

@article{nguyen2025-41000210,
  author  = {Nguyen, Tran To Tran and Vu, Lan Duong Tuyet and Truong, Khoa Tri and Nguyen, Tuan Chau and Thai, Truc Thanh and Schofield, Penelope E. and Nguyen, Tuan Anh and Than, The Ha Ngoc and others},
  title   = {{Smartphone App-Based Psychoeducation for Caregivers of People with Dementia in Vietnam: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial}},
  journal = {Clinical Interventions in Aging},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.2147/cia.s551994},
  pmid    = {41000210},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s551994}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This pilot randomized controlled trial found that a smartphone-based psychoeducational intervention for caregivers in Vietnam was feasible, well-accepted, and showed preliminary improvements in psychological distress, dementia knowledge, caregiver burden, and quality of life. The authors state that further investigation in a larger trial is warranted.

Study details

How this study scored 58/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 58 of 100.58 of 100 points earned42 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomized controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size and studied in people because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Clinical Interventions in Aging)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Clinical Interventions in Aging: journal h-index 138 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomized controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 1 / 2 Randomized (as stated in the record)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 5 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 5 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Huan Thanh Nguyen: h-index 8 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 The University of Melbourne: institution h-index 1,342 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 12 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41000210)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 58 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Caregiving

Also tagged “nursing”

995 studies in the library carry the topic tag “nursing”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 995 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →