Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 61 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Rationale Dementia is a common neurodegenerative condition in older age associated with functional decline across multiple domains. This decline impacts not only on the person with dementia, but also on their informal carers and health and aged care systems. With the number of people with dementia rapidly increasing and few effective treatments, there is now a critical need for interventions to improve functional ability in those with the condition. Aims and objective This study assesses the effectiveness of a community-based home exercise programme in improving cognitive and physical function and independence in activities of daily living (ADL) in people with Alzheimer's disease, the most common form of dementia. Methods In a 4-month randomized controlled trial, 40 community-dwelling patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and their informal carers were randomly allocated to either the treatment (exercise plus usual treatment) or control (usual treatment) group. The exercise programme consisted of daily exercises and walking under the supervision of their carer. Patients were assessed at baseline and 4-months follow-up by a blinded assessor on primary outcome measures of cognitive and physical function and ADL using standardized assessment scales. Results Sixteen men and 24 women diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease participated in the study. They had a mean age of 74.1 years (range 51-89) and a mean Mini Mental State Examination score of 22.0 (range 10-28), indicating mild to moderate dementia. At 4-months follow-up, patients who exercised, compared with controls, had improved cognition (increased Mini Mental State Examination scores by 2.6 points, p Conclusion This study suggests that participation in a community-based exercise programme can improve cognitive and physical function and independence in ADL in people with Alzheimer's disease.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Vreugdenhil, A., Cannell, J., Davies, A., & Razay, G. (2012). A community-based exercise programme to improve functional ability in people with Alzheimer's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00895.x

Vancouver

Vreugdenhil A, Cannell J, Davies A, Razay G. A community-based exercise programme to improve functional ability in people with Alzheimer's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences. 2012. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00895.x. PMID: 21564154.

BibTeX

@article{vreugdenhil2012-21564154,
  author  = {Vreugdenhil, A. and Cannell, J. and Davies, A. and Razay, G.},
  title   = {{A community-based exercise programme to improve functional ability in people with Alzheimer's disease: a randomized controlled trial}},
  journal = {Scandinavian journal of caring sciences},
  year    = {2012},
  doi     = {10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00895.x},
  pmid    = {21564154},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2011.00895.x}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this randomized trial of 40 people with Alzheimer's disease, those who did a 4-month home exercise program with their carer improved cognition compared with controls. The sample was small, so this suggests exercise may help function but does not show it cures or prevents Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 61/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 2 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 61 of 100.61 of 100 points earned39 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size and effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scandinavian journal of caring sciences)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences: journal h-index 108 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2012 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study)
Randomised / blinded 2 / 2 Randomised and blinded or placebo-controlled (as stated in the record)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 297 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 18.6 citations a year over 16 year(s) since 2012
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 6.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 16 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 52 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author George Razay: h-index 13 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 University of Tasmania: institution h-index 564 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 21564154)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 61 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 14.

Later studies that cite this one

16 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Caregiving

Also in Caregiving

69 studies in the library are filed under Caregiving with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Caregiving hub.

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →