Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Cognitive impairment and dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), pose a global health crisis, necessitating non-invasive biomarkers for early detection. This review highlights the retina, an accessible extension of the central nervous system (CNS), as a window to cerebral pathology through structural, functional, and molecular alterations. By synthesizing interdisciplinary evidence, we identify retinal biomarkers as promising tools for early diagnosis and risk stratification. Nevertheless, translating biomarkers into clinical practice faces significant translational hurdles, including methodological heterogeneity, confounding variables, lack of standardized protocols, and insufficient longitudinal validation in diverse populations. Overcoming these challenges through rigorous standardization and robust validation studies is essential to establish the clinical utility of retinal biomarkers. HIGHLIGHTS: Stage-specific diagnostic potential: Retinal biomarkers (e.g., OCT/OCTA changes, eye movements, molecular deposits) show alterations correlating with cognitive impairment stages (preclinical AD to dementia), assisting stage differentiation. Reflecting cerebral pathology: Multimodal retinal alterations (structural, functional, molecular) correlate with key brain pathologies (amyloid/tau burden, atrophy, small vessel disease), indicating shared pathways. Translation gaps and future: Clinical adoption faces barriers (method heterogeneity, confounders, limited validation). Future requires rigorous screening of candidate retinal biomarkers, extensive multicenter validation, and artificial intelligence (AI)-facilitated clinical translation.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Yan, M., Zhou, H., Li, Z., & Wang, Y. (2025). Retinal biomarkers in cognitive impairment and dementia: Structural, functional, and molecular insights. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70672

Vancouver

Yan M, Zhou H, Li Z, Wang Y. Retinal biomarkers in cognitive impairment and dementia: Structural, functional, and molecular insights. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz.70672. PMID: 40927874.

BibTeX

@article{yan2025-40927874,
  author  = {Yan, Min and Zhou, Hongyu and Li, Zixiao and Wang, Yongjun},
  title   = {{Retinal biomarkers in cognitive impairment and dementia: Structural, functional, and molecular insights}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.70672},
  pmid    = {40927874},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.70672}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review describes retinal changes as possible non-invasive markers for early diagnosis and risk stratification in cognitive impairment and dementia. It states that translating these markers into practice faces hurdles such as inconsistent methods, confounding factors, and insufficient long-term validation, so no treatment or cure is offered.

Study details

How this study scored 51/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 51 of 100.51 of 100 points earned49 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 19 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 6.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 12.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 19 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Yongjun Wang: h-index 18 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College: institution h-index 950 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40927874)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 51 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 33.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “cerebrospinal”

821 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cerebrospinal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 821 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →