Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Introduction It is unknown whether progressive resistance training (PRT) improves cognitive function in adults with cerebral small vessel disease and mild cognitive impairment (i.e., subcortical vascular cognitive impairment [SVCI]). Methods We conducted a 12-month randomized trial comparing PRT versus balance and tone exercises (BAT) on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive Plus (ADAS-Cog-Plus). Results Ninety-one participants were randomized (PRT = 45; BAT = 46); 76 completed the trial. Adherence was not different between groups (p = 0.18). At 12 months, PRT significantly improved ADAS-Cog-Plus scores (estimated mean difference: -0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI: -0.35, -0.01]; p = 0.04). Planned contrasts stratified by sex showed a significant PRT effect on ADAS-Cog-Plus scores for females (mean difference: -0.27; 95% CI: [-0.49, -0.05]; p = 0.02), but not for males. PRT also significantly reduced C-reactive protein (estimated mean difference: -2.93; 95% CI: [-5.36, -0.49]; p = 0.02). No significant differences were observed for other secondary outcomes. Discussion PRT may have a small beneficial effect on cognitive function in SVCI. Clinical trial registration This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02669394).

Key findings

Why it matters

In this 12-month randomized trial of 91 adults with subcortical vascular cognitive impairment, progressive resistance training significantly improved cognitive scores compared with balance and tone exercises, and also reduced C-reactive protein. The effect was small and was seen in females but not males, so it suggests a possible modest benefit rather than a cure or prevention.

Study details

Limitations

Small sample with 15 dropouts; single site; borderline significance; other secondary outcomes did not differ.

How this study scored 65/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 2 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 61 of the 94 points it could be judged on, which is 65 of 100. Total 65 of 100.61 of the 94 points we could judge = 65 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. We have no data on senior author's track record and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 61 of the 94 points we could judge it on, which is 65 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 2 / 5 Rated “early” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 91 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 19.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Roger C Tam holds only 6 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Oxford: institution h-index 2,205 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 10 institution(s) in 3 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41795685)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 61 / 94 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 61 of the 94 points we could judge it on is 65 out of 100.
Total 65 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Liu-Ambrose, T., Falck, R. S., Dao, E., Crockett, R. A., Barha, C. K., Silva, N. C. B. S., et al. (2026). Resistance training and subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: A 12-month randomized trial. Alzheimer's & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71245

Vancouver

Liu-Ambrose T, Falck RS, Dao E, Crockett RA, Barha CK, Silva NCBS, et al. Resistance training and subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: A 12-month randomized trial. Alzheimer's & Dementia. 2026. doi:10.1002/alz.71245. PMID: 41795685.

BibTeX

@article{liuambrose2026-41795685,
  author  = {Liu-Ambrose, T. and Falck, R. S. and Dao, E. and Crockett, R. A. and Barha, C. K. and Silva, N. C. B. S. and others},
  title   = {{Resistance training and subcortical vascular cognitive impairment: A 12-month randomized trial}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& Dementia},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.71245},
  pmid    = {41795685},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.71245}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Treatments

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →