Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology

Plain-language summary

Background Family physicians' attitudes toward people with dementia are important for delivering person-centered care and coordinating long-term care. Accordingly, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship—which remains insufficiently clarified—between empathy and family physicians' general, supportive, accepting, and exclusionary attitudes toward people with dementia. Methods This cross-sectional study included 412 family physicians working at family health centers in Türkiye who participated voluntarily. Data were collected face-to-face and online from May 2023 to February 2024. Attitudes and empathy were assessed using the Dementia Attitudes Scale and the Empathy Quotient. Multiple linear regression models were constructed separately for the total score and subscales of the Dementia Attitudes Scale. Results Participants' mean age was 43.03 ± 9.65 years; mean Dementia Attitudes Scale and Empathy Quotient total scores were 97.74 ± 16.58 and 50.51 ± 8.22, respectively. Empathy was positively associated with general attitude (r = 0.445), supporting attitude (r = 0.481), and accepting attitude (r = 0.348), but not with exclusionary attitude (r = 0.091; p = 0.066). In multiple linear regression, empathy was independently associated with general attitude (B = 0.871; 95% CI 0.696–1.047; p < 0.001), supportive attitude (B = 0.535; 95% CI 0.439–0.631; p < 0.001), and accepting attitude (B = 0.295; 95% CI 0.216–0.374; p < 0.001), but not with exclusionary attitude. A higher daily patient volume was independently associated with a more positive general attitude and a less exclusionary attitude, while prior dementia training was independently associated with a less exclusionary attitude. Conclusion Family physicians' empathy levels were independently associated with general, supportive, and accepting attitudes toward people with dementia, but not with exclusionary attitudes. Higher daily patient volume was linked to more positive general attitudes and fewer exclusionary attitudes, while prior dementia training was associated with fewer exclusionary attitudes.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Yokus, S. E., Ozcan, F., & Elbi, H. (2026). Family physicians' attitudes toward people with dementia and their association with empathy. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11066796/v1

Vancouver

Yokus SE, Ozcan F, Elbi H. Family physicians' attitudes toward people with dementia and their association with empathy. Research Square. 2026. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11066796/v1.

BibTeX

@article{yokus2026-cd317d80,
  author  = {Yokus, S. E. and Ozcan, F. and Elbi, H.},
  title   = {{Family physicians' attitudes toward people with dementia and their association with empathy}},
  journal = {Research Square},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.21203/rs.3.rs-11066796/v1},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11066796/v1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 4 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 22 of the 62 points it could be judged on, which is 35 of 100. Raw total 35 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 35 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 35 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 35 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Research Square)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 4 / 10 Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 412 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 22 / 62 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 35 out of 100.
Total 35 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery from nearby years

Also tagged “assisted-living”

199 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assisted-living”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 199 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →