Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 37 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Lecanemab, an amyloid-targeting monoclonal antibody, was recently approved for early symptomatic Alzheimer's disease in South Korea. Asians were underrepresented in prior trials, and real-world data from Korea remain scarce, particularly regarding treatment settings, adverse events, and barriers to scalability. We assessed the feasibility and safety of lecanemab among Korean patients in a real-world tertiary hospital. A total of 112 patients initiated lecanemab treatment between December 2024 and October 2025 at Asan Medical Center. Prevalence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs), Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities (ARIA), treatment discontinuation, and factors limiting implementation were evaluated. Among 112 patients (mean age 71 years; 59% female), IRRs occurred in 41 (37%) and were generally mild or moderate under active surveillance. Among 105 at-risk patients who received at least four infusions and had at least one monitoring MRI, ARIA developed in 20 (19%): ARIA-E/H in 6 (5.7%) and isolated ARIA-H in 14 (13.3%). Only 1 patient with isolated ARIA-H presented with transient confusion. Patients with ARIA-E/H were younger, whereas those with ARIA-H were older and more likely to have baseline microhemorrhages. Eleven out of 105 were APOE ε4/ε4 homozygotes, of whom 5 developed ARIA. The rapid increase in treatment demand exceeded outpatient infusion capacity, resulting in progressively longer waiting times-up to 20 weeks 9 months after program initiation. This single-center experience from a tertiary referral hospital in Korea demonstrates that lecanemab treatment was feasible and generally well-tolerated, with manageable adverse events including ARIA and IRRs; however, limited infusion capacity, lack of reimbursement, and patient concentration in tertiary centers highlight the need for referral networks and system-level strategies to improve nationwide accessibility.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Hyemin, J., Woo, K. J., Won, H. J., Da Woon, J., Jeongeun, K., Da Min, K., et al. (2026). Real-world safety and implementation challenges of lecanemab therapy for Alzheimer's disease in South Korea: a single-center experience. Alzheimer's research & therapy. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-026-02141-1

Vancouver

Hyemin J, Woo KJ, Won HJ, Da Woon J, Jeongeun K, Da Min K, et al. Real-world safety and implementation challenges of lecanemab therapy for Alzheimer's disease in South Korea: a single-center experience. Alzheimer's research & therapy. 2026. doi:10.1186/s13195-026-02141-1. PMID: 42449395.

BibTeX

@article{hyemin2026-42449395,
  author  = {Hyemin, Jang and Woo, Kim Jae and Won, Hwang Jung and Da Woon, Jeong and Jeongeun, Ka and Da Min, Kang and Hyun, Suh Chong and Yangsean, Choi and others},
  title   = {{Real-world safety and implementation challenges of lecanemab therapy for Alzheimer's disease in South Korea: a single-center experience}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's research \& therapy},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1186/s13195-026-02141-1},
  pmid    = {42449395},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-026-02141-1}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In 112 Korean patients treated with lecanemab at one hospital, infusion-related reactions occurred in 37% and ARIA in 19% of those monitored, and demand outstripped infusion capacity with waits up to 20 weeks. This single-centre real-world experience describes safety and implementation challenges of an approved therapy, not a cure or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 37/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 37 of 100.37 of 100 points earned63 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer's research & therapy)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Alzheimer s Research & Therapy: journal h-index 146 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 112 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Jae‐Hong Lee: h-index 48 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore: institution h-index 606 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42449395)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 37 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “double-blind”

783 studies in the library carry the topic tag “double-blind”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 783 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →