Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 38 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The burden of perioperative organ injury in China is significant even at a national level. Similarly, the extreme mortality associated with liver injury (68.7%) and ARDS (44.7%) makes their prevention a top priority, as successful rescue is often beyond our current capacities [1].The study noted delirium had the " lowest " mortality (10.8%). To address relative staff shortages, the development and use of intelligent clinical support systems for monitoring and alerting are needed.According to the findings of global ICU needs assessment surveys, there is significant variation in ICU resources and staffing worldwide, which may lead to differences in practices and outcomes across healthcare systems [17]. Disparities may still exist between different regions within China (e.g., urban versus rural), which mirrors situations in countries like India [19].Southeast and South Asia: ICU care protocols and guidelines in these regions may be less uniform and standardized due to disparities in healthcare resources and training.China: ICU care protocols and guidelines in China are relatively more unified and standardized. A study on predictors of VAP prevention practices among ICU nurses in Sarawak revealed a gap between nurses' knowledge levels and their self-reported practices [20]. AI has also demonstrated significant advantages in predicting postoperative complications such as cardiovascular events [23]. By prioritizing resource-appropriate, preventative strategies and building a robust perioperative medicine system, we can mitigate this global burden and significantly improve surgical outcomes for the millions of patients we serve.Li Gang Chief of the Department of General Surgery, Mianzhu Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Mianzhu City, Sichuan Province, China.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Li, G. (2026). Prioritizing perioperative organ injury prevention: a call to action from China's county-level hospitals. Frontiers in Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1758034

Vancouver

Li G. Prioritizing perioperative organ injury prevention: a call to action from China's county-level hospitals. Frontiers in Medicine. 2026. doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1758034. PMID: 41658586.

BibTeX

@article{li2026-41658586,
  author  = {Li, Gang},
  title   = {{Prioritizing perioperative organ injury prevention: a call to action from China's county-level hospitals}},
  journal = {Frontiers in Medicine},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.3389/fmed.2026.1758034},
  pmid    = {41658586},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1758034}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This commentary concerns perioperative organ injury in China's county-level hospitals and mentions delirium mortality, but it does not report findings on treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 38/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 36 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 38 of 100. Total 38 of 100.36 of the 96 points we could judge = 38 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 36 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 38 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in Medicine)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Frontiers in Medicine: journal h-index 149 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.5 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Gang Li holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Sichuan University: institution h-index 720 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41658586)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 36 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 36 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 38 out of 100.
Total 38 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “palliative”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “palliative”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →