Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

The query: title or abstract mentions "delirium" or "acute confusion", matched case-insensitively against each record's title and abstract (its summary field) in alzhub's library of 29,780 study records, as of 2026-11-09. Every count on this page comes from that match. The matched list as JSON.

Delirium comes on over hours or days, fluctuates, and is triggered by illness, surgery, medicines or dehydration. Dementia is the strongest risk factor for it, and an episode of delirium is in turn associated with a higher chance of dementia being diagnosed later and with faster decline in people who already have it. Whether delirium causes lasting damage or reveals a brain that was already vulnerable is the central question in this research.

Because delirium is often preventable with simple measures in hospital, the prevention trials are of practical importance to families and hospitals alike.

This page describes what published research in alzhub's library reports. It is not medical advice and does not apply to any one person: a doctor who knows the person's history is the only one who can say what a result or a treatment means for them.

What the studies report, in their own words

Whole sentences copied from the abstract or key findings of the highest-scoring matched studies, chosen because they mention the subject and give a figure. 8 of the 473 matched records are quoted; each links to its study page and from there to the paper.

“Background delirium affects up to 40% of older hospitalised patients, but there has been no systematic review focussing on risk factors for incident delirium in older medical inpatients.”
From the abstract of Risk factors for incident delirium among older people in acute hospital medical units: a systematic review and meta-analysis · Age and ageing · 2014 · systematic review ·
“Post-operative delirium was apparent in 18% of CABG patients which increased to 24% when a diagnostic instrument was utilized alongside clinical criteria.”
From the abstract of Cognitive outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 91,829 patients · International journal of cardiology · 2019 · meta-analysis ·
“There is moderate-certainty evidence regarding the benefit of multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of delirium in hospitalised adults, estimated to reduce incidence by 43% compared to usual care.”
From the abstract of Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients · The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021 · meta-analysis ·
“Multicomponent interventions significantly reduced incident delirium (relative risk [RR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.85, P<0.001) and accidental falls during the hospitalisation (RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21, 0.72, P=0.003), without evidence of differential effectiveness according to ward type or dementia rates.”
From the abstract of Preventing delirium: should non-pharmacological, multicomponent interventions be used? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature · Age and ageing · 2015 · systematic review ·
“Seven studies were conducted in general medical or geriatric medicine settings.We found multi-component interventions reduced the incidence of delirium compared to usual care (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.81; seven studies; 1950 participants; moderate-quality evidence).”
From the abstract of Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients · The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016 ·
“Melatonin was associated with a lower risk of delirium (12.0% vs.”
From the abstract of Melatonin decreases delirium in elderly patients: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial · International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2011 ·
“We performed a systematic review of the associations, in older people, between retinal layer thickness changes (measured using OCT) and delirium or MCI compared to controls (Protocol registration ID (Prospero) CRD42019122165).”
From the key findings of Optical coherence tomography in mild cognitive impairment - Systematic review and meta-analysis · Clinical neurology and neurosurgery · 2020 · systematic review ·
“Results Of 1583 articles, data subjected from the 24 studies (including 3562 patients who experienced delirium and 6987 controls who did not) were included in a random-effects meta-analysis for pooled effect estimates and random-effects meta-regressions to identify sources of study variance.”
From the key findings of Association of Delirium With Long-term Cognitive Decline: A Meta-analysis · JAMA neurology · 2020 · systematic review ·

What kind of evidence it is

By study design

Design (as recorded)Studies
Systematic review or meta-analysis37
Randomised controlled trial13
Other clinical trial4
Cohort or longitudinal study95
Case-control study10
Cross-sectional study14
Other recorded design7
No design recorded293

The design is the one named in alzhub's record for the study; a record with none is counted as "no design recorded".

By year

YearStudiesShare
202644
202599
20245
20236
20229
202122
202020
20199
201820
201716
2016 and earlier223

Other counts within the matched set

Peer-reviewed articles469
Marked open access in the record185
Rated "high" evidence strength in alzhub's summary73
Rated "moderate" evidence strength in alzhub's summary121
Rated "low" evidence strength in alzhub's summary278
No evidence-strength rating1
Records stating a participant count247
Median participants (those records)284
Largest participant count1,686,759

Within the 473 matched studies

Studies…CountRule
…about surgery or postoperative delirium128the abstract also contains "postoperative", "surgery", "surgical" or "anaesthesia"
…that mention prevention87the abstract also contains "prevent"
…that report a hazard ratio or odds ratio306the abstract also contains "hazard ratio", "odds ratio", "HR" or "OR"

The 10 highest-scoring matched studies

Title matches first, then by alzhub's usefulness score, which rates a study's design, journal, evidence and recency, not whether its result is good news.

  1. Processed electroencephalogram and evoked potential techniques for amelioration of postoperative delirium and cognitive dysfunction following non-cardiac and non-neurosurgical procedures in adults The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018 · 2,929 participants · · Peer-reviewed
  2. Delirium in elderly patients and the risk of postdischarge mortality, institutionalization, and dementia: a meta-analysis JAMA · 2010 · meta-analysis · 714 participants · · Peer-reviewed
  3. Risk factors for incident delirium among older people in acute hospital medical units: a systematic review and meta-analysis Age and ageing · 2014 · systematic review · 411 participants · · Peer-reviewed
  4. Non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021 · meta-analysis · 22 participants · · Peer-reviewed
  5. A Focused Update to the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Anxiety, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU Critical Care Medicine · 2025 · systematic review · 24 participants · · Peer-reviewed
  6. Preventing delirium: should non-pharmacological, multicomponent interventions be used? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature Age and ageing · 2015 · systematic review · 1,691 participants · · Peer-reviewed
  7. Persistent delirium in older hospital patients: a systematic review of frequency and prognosis Age and ageing · 2009 · meta-analysis · 1,322 participants · · Peer-reviewed
  8. The risk factors for postoperative delirium in adult patients after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis International journal of geriatric psychiatry · 2021 · 104,572 participants · · Peer-reviewed
  9. Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Impact of Delirium on Hospitalized Older Adults With Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · 2022 · systematic review · 81 participants · · Peer-reviewed
  10. Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non-ICU patients The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016 · 39 participants · · Peer-reviewed

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the set

37 of the matched records are recorded as a systematic review, meta-analysis or umbrella review; the highest-scoring not already listed above:

Newest matched studies

Journals with the most matched studies

JournalStudies
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society31
Age and Ageing14
Age and ageing11
International journal of geriatric psychiatry10
The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences8

Questions

How is delirium different from dementia?
Delirium starts suddenly, fluctuates through the day and usually has a trigger such as infection, surgery or a new medicine; dementia develops over months and years. A person with dementia who becomes suddenly more confused should be assessed for delirium, which is often treatable.
How many studies on delirium and dementia does alzhub hold?
473 of the 29,780 study records in alzhub's library match the query "title or abstract mentions "delirium" or "acute confusion""; 292 of them name it in the title. Counted from the records when this page was built.
What kinds of study are they?
37 systematic review or meta-analysis, 13 randomised controlled trials, 4 other clinical trials, 95 cohort or longitudinal studys, 10 case-control studys, 14 cross-sectional studys; 293 record no design.
What is the most recent study in the set?
"Plasma Neurofilament Light Chain is Markedly Elevated in General Hospital Inpatients with Delirium" (medRxiv, 2026), the newest by publication date among the matched records.
Which journals publish most on it?
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (31); Age and Ageing (14); Age and ageing (11), counted across the matched records.

Read on

Library subjects these studies are filed under

All answer pages →