Home › Research › Digital health tools
An explainable machine learning approach for Alzheimer's disease classification
Alatrany AS, Khan W, Hussain A, Kolivand H, Al-Jumeily D.. Scientific reports, 2024-02-01
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
The early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) presents a significant challenge due to the subtle biomarker changes often overlooked. Machine learning (ML) models offer a promising tool for identifying individuals at risk of AD. However, current research tends to prioritize ML accuracy while neglecting the crucial aspect of model explainability. The diverse nature of AD data and the limited dataset size introduce additional challenges, primarily related to high dimensionality. In this study, we leveraged a dataset obtained from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center, comprising 169,408 records and 1024 features. After applying various steps to reduce the feature space. Notably, support vector machine (SVM) models trained on the selected features exhibited high performance when tested on an external dataset. SVM achieved a high F1 score of 98.9% for binary classification (distinguishing between NC and AD) and 90.7% for multiclass classification. Furthermore, SVM was able to predict AD progression over a 4-year period, with F1 scores reached 88% for binary task and 72.8% for multiclass task. To enhance model explainability, we employed two rule-extraction approaches: class rule mining and stable and interpretable rule set for classification model. These approaches generated human-understandable rules to assist domain experts in comprehending the key factors involved in AD development. We further validated these rules using SHAP and LIME models, underscoring the significance of factors such as MEMORY, JUDGMENT, COMMUN, and ORIENT in determining AD risk. Our experimental outcomes also shed light on the crucial role of the Clinical Dementia Rating tool in predicting AD.
Key findings
- The early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) presents a significant challenge due to the subtle biomarker changes often overlooked.
Why it matters
This study used machine learning on a large dataset to classify Alzheimer's disease and predict its progression over 4 years, with support vector machine models showing high performance. The authors also generated human-understandable rules to help experts understand the key factors involved in classification.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →
Study details
- Effect size98.9%; 90.7%; 72.8%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 56/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific reports) |
| Journal's citation record | 3 / 4 | Scientific Reports: journal h-index 463 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 5 / 7 | Cited 167 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 4 / 5 | 41.8 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024 |
| Impact for its field and year | 6 / 6 | Cited 45.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 2 / 6 | Cited by 5 other studies in this library |
| Still being cited | 3 / 4 | Cited 167 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 2 / 4 | Last-listed author Dhiya Al‐Jumeily: h-index 39 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 1 / 3 | University of Leicester: institution h-index 862 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 3 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38302557) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 56 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51985-w
- PubMed: 38302557
- Original source →
- Free full text: Scientific Reports →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Alatrany, A. S., Khan, W., Hussain, A., Kolivand, H., & Al-Jumeily, D. (2024). An explainable machine learning approach for Alzheimer's disease classification. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51985-w
Vancouver
Alatrany AS, Khan W, Hussain A, Kolivand H, Al-Jumeily D. An explainable machine learning approach for Alzheimer's disease classification. Scientific reports. 2024. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51985-w. PMID: 38302557.
BibTeX
@article{alatrany2024-38302557,
author = {Alatrany, A. S. and Khan, W. and Hussain, A. and Kolivand, H. and Al-Jumeily, D.},
title = {{An explainable machine learning approach for Alzheimer's disease classification}},
journal = {Scientific reports},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-024-51985-w},
pmid = {38302557},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51985-w}
}
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Later studies that cite this one
5 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.
Related studies in Digital health tools
Also in Digital health tools
178 studies in the library are filed under Digital health tools with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Digital health tools hub.