Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Thirty constitutive elements of ACP were identified (e.g., 'assess understanding of ACP'). Only five were deemed 'optional.' The panel estimated a median of four conversations could address elements to be addressed at least once. Recommendations included to assume capacity as a principle, conscious of the need to explore its fluctuation, to encourage engaging and playing active roles, and to establish connection and inform and prepare family. There was a consensus to offer ACP around dementia diagnosis, to raise end-of-life issues later, and to personalize ACP with flexibility, providing of information and exploring understanding. The advice of the persons with dementia pointed to a wish for a well-coordinated holistic approach. Consensus was reached, including in areas of ambiguity, to guide ACP in dementia. ACP should be embedded in a nonprescriptive, individualized approach that involves both the person with dementia and their families. Future studies may evaluate trade-offs between optimal ACP and feasible implementation.

Key findings

Why it matters

This 33-country Delphi study reached consensus on 30 constitutive elements of advance care planning in dementia, recommending that it be offered around dementia diagnosis, that end-of-life issues be raised later, and that it be embedded in a nonprescriptive, individualized approach involving both the person with dementia and their families. It provides guidance for care planning, not for treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 49/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 49 of 100.49 of 100 points earned51 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Pain and Symptom Management)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Journal of Pain and Symptom Management: journal h-index 213 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 19 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 6.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 16.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 6 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 19 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Ida J. Korfage: h-index 53 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of California, San Francisco: institution h-index 1,915 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 22 institution(s) in 12 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40032035)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 49 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

van der Steen, J. T., Van den Block, L., Nakanishi, M., Dening, K. H., Parker, D., Larkin, P. J., et al. (2025). Optimizing Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Recommendations From a 33-Country Delphi Study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.471

Vancouver

van der Steen JT, Van den Block L, Nakanishi M, Dening KH, Parker D, Larkin PJ, et al. Optimizing Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Recommendations From a 33-Country Delphi Study. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.471. PMID: 40032035.

BibTeX

@article{vandersteen2025-40032035,
  author  = {van der Steen, Jenny Theodora and Van den Block, Lieve and Nakanishi, Miharu and Dening, Karen Harrison and Parker, Deborah and Larkin, Philip Joseph and Di Giulio, Paola and der Schmitten, Jürgen in and others},
  title   = {{Optimizing Advance Care Planning in Dementia: Recommendations From a 33-Country Delphi Study}},
  journal = {Journal of Pain and Symptom Management},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.471},
  pmid    = {40032035},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2025.02.471}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

6 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Caregiving

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →