Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objectives To quantify the time required for nurses to complete the medication administration process in long-term care (LTC). Design Time-motion methods were used to time all steps in the medication administration process. Setting LTC units that differed according to case mix (physical support, behavioral care, dementia care, and continuing care) in a single facility in Ontario, Canada. Participants Regular and temporary nurses who agreed to be observed. Measurements Seven predefined steps, interruptions, and total time required for the medication administration process were timed using a personal digital assistant. Results One hundred forty-one medication rounds were observed. Total time estimates were standardized to 20 beds to facilitate comparisons. For a single medication administration process, the average total time was 62.0+/-4.9 minutes per 20 residents on physical support units, 84.0+/-4.5 minutes per 20 residents on behavioral care units, and 70.0+/-4.9 minutes per 20 residents on dementia care units. Regular nurses took an average of 68.0+/-4.9 minutes per 20 residents to complete the medication administration process, and temporary nurses took an average of 90.0+/-5.4 minutes per 20 residents. On continuing care units, which are organized differently because of the greater severity of residents' needs, the medication administration process took 9.6+/-3.2 minutes per resident. Interruptions occurred in 79% of observations and accounted for 11.5% of the medication administration process. Conclusion Time requirements for the medication administration process are substantial in LTC and are compounded when nurses are unfamiliar with residents. Interruptions are a major problem, potentially affecting the efficiency, quality, and safety of this process.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study measured how long nurses take to give medications in long-term care units, including dementia care units, but it did not test any treatment for Alzheimer's disease. It provides information about staffing and safety, not about curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 4 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 41 of 100.41 of 100 points earned59 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of the American Geriatrics Society)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Journal of the American Geriatrics Society: journal h-index 344 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2009 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 4 / 7 Cited 73 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.8 citations a year over 19 year(s) since 2009
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 8.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 9 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Paula A. Rochon: h-index 86 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School: institution h-index 990 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19170782)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Thomson, M. S., Gruneir, A., Lee, M., Baril, J., Field, T. S., Gurwitz, J. H., et al. (2009). Nursing time devoted to medication administration in long-term care: clinical, safety, and resource implications. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02101.x

Vancouver

Thomson MS, Gruneir A, Lee M, Baril J, Field TS, Gurwitz JH, et al. Nursing time devoted to medication administration in long-term care: clinical, safety, and resource implications. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02101.x. PMID: 19170782.

BibTeX

@article{thomson2009-19170782,
  author  = {Thomson, M. S. and Gruneir, A. and Lee, M. and Baril, J. and Field, T. S. and Gurwitz, J. H. and Rochon, P. A.},
  title   = {{Nursing time devoted to medication administration in long-term care: clinical, safety, and resource implications}},
  journal = {Journal of the American Geriatrics Society},
  year    = {2009},
  doi     = {10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02101.x},
  pmid    = {19170782},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02101.x}
}

Related studies in Digital health tools

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →