Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100. Inflammation and the immune system

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the leading cause of dementia globally, having a pathophysiology that is complex and multifactorial. Recent findings highlight the significant role of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), specifically microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), circular RNAs (circRNAs), and piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) in the molecular mechanisms underlying AD. These ncRNAs are involved in critical biological processes such as cell proliferation, apoptosis, oxidative stress, amyloid-beta aggregation, tau phosphorylation, neuroinflammation, and autophagy, which are pivotal in AD development and progression. This systematic review aims to consolidate current scientific knowledge on the role of ncRNAs in AD, making it the first to encompass the four types of ncRNAs associated with the disease. Our comprehensive search and analysis reveal that ncRNAs not only play crucial roles in the pathogenesis of AD but also hold potential as biomarkers for its early detection and as novel therapeutic targets. Specifically, the findings underscore the significance of miRNAs in regulating genes involved in key AD pathways such as activin receptor signaling pathway, actomyosin contractile ring organization, and advanced glycation endproducts-receptor advanced glycation endproducts (AGE-RAGE) signaling pathway. This review also highlights the potential of ncRNAs in unveiling novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, emphasizing the need for further research to validate their clinical utility. Our systematic exploration provides a foundation for future bioinformatic analyses and the development of ncRNA-based precision medicine approaches for AD, offering new insights into the disease's molecular pathology and paving the way for innovative treatment strategies. Systematic review registration PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, CRD42022355307.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Canoy, R. J., Sy, J. C., Deguit, C. D., Castro, C. B., Dimaapi, L. J., Panlaqui, B. G., et al. (2024). Non-coding RNAs involved in the molecular pathology of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. Frontiers in neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1421675

Vancouver

Canoy RJ, Sy JC, Deguit CD, Castro CB, Dimaapi LJ, Panlaqui BG, et al. Non-coding RNAs involved in the molecular pathology of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2024. doi:10.3389/fnins.2024.1421675. PMID: 39005845.

BibTeX

@article{canoy2024-39005845,
  author  = {Canoy, R. J. and Sy, J. C. and Deguit, C. D. and Castro, C. B. and Dimaapi, L. J. and Panlaqui, B. G. and Perian, W. and Yu, J. and others},
  title   = {{Non-coding RNAs involved in the molecular pathology of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review}},
  journal = {Frontiers in neuroscience},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.3389/fnins.2024.1421675},
  pmid    = {39005845},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1421675}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This systematic review gathers evidence on four kinds of non-coding RNAs, molecules that regulate genes without making proteins, in Alzheimer's disease. They are involved in amyloid-beta clumping, tau changes, inflammation and other disease processes, and may serve as markers for early detection and as new treatment targets. The authors stress that more research is needed to confirm their clinical usefulness.

Study details

How this study scored 59/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 57 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 59 of 100. Total 59 of 100.57 of the 96 points we could judge = 59 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a systematic review of all the studies on the question. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 57 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 59 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Frontiers in neuroscience)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Frontiers in Neuroscience: journal h-index 226 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A systematic review of all the studies on the question
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomization is not credited here
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 16 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 4.0 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 16 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Anna Gibson holds only 7 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 The University of Melbourne: institution h-index 1,342 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39005845)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 57 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 57 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 59 out of 100.
Total 59 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Inflammation and the immune system

Also in Inflammation and the immune system

138 studies in the library are filed under Inflammation and the immune system with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Inflammation and the immune system hub.

Similar studies

More on Inflammation and the immune system

See all studies in Inflammation and the immune system →