Home › Research › Treatments
Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated neuroprotection by donepezil against glutamate neurotoxicity in rat cortical neurons
Takada Y, Yonezawa A, Kume T, Katsuki H, Kaneko S, Sugimoto H, Akaike A.. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2003-05-06
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Donepezil is a potent and selective acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor developed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. To elucidate whether donepezil shows neuroprotective action in addition to amelioration of cognitive deficits, we examined the effects of donepezil on glutamate-induced neurotoxicity using primary cultures of rat cortical neurons. A 10-min exposure of cultures to glutamate followed by a 1-h incubation with glutamate-free medium caused a marked loss of viability, as determined by Trypan blue exclusion. Glutamate neurotoxicity was prevented by 24-h pretreatment of donepezil in a concentration-dependent manner. Among AChE inhibitors examined, donepezil and certain AChE inhibitors such as tacrine and galanthamine showed potent neuroprotective action, although physostigmine did not affect glutamate neurotoxicity. Neuroprotective action of donepezil was antagonized by mecamylamine, a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) antagonist, but not by scopolamine, a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist. Furthermore, both dihydro-beta-erythroidine, an alpha4beta2-neuronal nAChR antagonist, and methyllycaconitine, an alpha7-nAChR antagonist, each also significantly antagonized the effect of donepezil. Next, we examined the effects of donepezil on glutamate-induced apoptosis. Exposure of 100 microM glutamate to cortical neurons for 24 h induced apoptotic neuronal death and nuclear fragmentation. Donepezil for 24 h before and 24 h during glutamate exposure prevented nuclear fragmentation and glutamate-induced apoptosis. These results suggest that donepezil not only protects cortical neurons against glutamate neurotoxicity via alpha4beta2- and alpha7-nAChRs but also prevents apoptotic neuronal death.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Takada, Y., Yonezawa, A., Kume, T., Katsuki, H., Kaneko, S., Sugimoto, H., et al. (2003). Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated neuroprotection by donepezil against glutamate neurotoxicity in rat cortical neurons. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.050104
Vancouver
Takada Y, Yonezawa A, Kume T, Katsuki H, Kaneko S, Sugimoto H, et al. Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated neuroprotection by donepezil against glutamate neurotoxicity in rat cortical neurons. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 2003. doi:10.1124/jpet.103.050104. PMID: 12734391.
BibTeX
@article{takada2003-12734391,
author = {Takada, Y. and Yonezawa, A. and Kume, T. and Katsuki, H. and Kaneko, S. and Sugimoto, H. and Akaike, A.},
title = {{Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor-mediated neuroprotection by donepezil against glutamate neurotoxicity in rat cortical neurons}},
journal = {The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics},
year = {2003},
doi = {10.1124/jpet.103.050104},
pmid = {12734391},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.103.050104}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Furthermore, both dihydro-beta-erythroidine, an alpha4beta2-neuronal nAChR antagonist, and methyllycaconitine, an alpha7-nAChR antagonist, each also significantly antagonized the effect of donepezil.
- These results suggest that donepezil not only protects cortical neurons against glutamate neurotoxicity via alpha4beta2- and alpha7-nAChRs but also prevents apoptotic neuronal death.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Treatments →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 36/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 36 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2003 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Laboratory or animal study (title names “rat”) — scores zero |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 12734391) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 21 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 21 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 36 out of 100. |
| Total | 36 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Treatments
Also tagged “cortical-neurons”
4 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cortical-neurons”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 4 tagged studies.