Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 28 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder marked by memory loss, cognitive decline, and behavioral changes. The disease develops through several mechanisms, including amyloid-beta plaque formation, tau protein hyperphosphorylation, oxidative stress, inflammation, and synaptic failure. Neuropharmacological treatments aim to influence these processes to relieve symptoms and slow disease progression. Current drugs mainly include cholinesterase inhibitors, which strengthen cholinergic activity, and NMDA receptor antagonists, which balance glutamatergic transmission. New therapeutic directions focus on disease modification by targeting amyloid and tau pathology, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammatory pathways. Advances in molecular neuropharmacology — such as monoclonal antibodies, small-molecule inhibitors, and neuroprotective compounds — may lead to more effective therapies. Understanding the complex molecular and neurochemical basis of AD is essential for developing next-generation drugs to enhance cognitive health and quality of life.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Satdive, B., Padosa, S., & Patil, Y. (2025). Neuropharmacology of Alzheimer Disease. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17711756

Vancouver

Satdive B, Padosa S, Patil Y. Neuropharmacology of Alzheimer Disease. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2025. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17711756.

BibTeX

@article{satdive2025-92336d40,
  author  = {Satdive, Bhumika and Padosa, Shweta and Patil, Yashodeep},
  title   = {{Neuropharmacology of Alzheimer Disease}},
  journal = {Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.5281/zenodo.17711756},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17711756}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Current neuropharmacological treatments for Alzheimer's disease mainly include cholinesterase inhibitors and NMDA receptor antagonists, which aim to relieve symptoms and slow disease progression. New directions focus on disease modification by targeting amyloid and tau pathology, oxidative stress and neuroinflammatory pathways, with monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule inhibitors as possible future therapies.

Study details

How this study scored 28/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 25 of the 89 points it could be judged on, which is 28 of 100. Total 28 of 100.25 of the 89 points we could judge = 28 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 25 of the 89 points we could judge it on, which is 28 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research))
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 25 / 89 Scored on 17 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 25 of the 89 points we could judge it on is 28 out of 100.
Total 28 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Treatments

Also in Treatments

192 studies in the library are filed under Treatments with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Treatments hub.

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →