Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 28 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

La carta al editor presenta recomendaciones actualizadas para el uso de donanemab en la enfermedad de Alzheimer (EA), basadas en su papel dentro de la hipótesis de la cascada amiloide. Este anticuerpo monoclonal IgG1 se dirige a formas específicas de β-amiloide y promueve su eliminación mediante mecanismos mediados por microglía. Se destacan los resultados de ensayos clínicos como TRAILBLAZER-ALZ, en los cuales donanemab demostró una reducción significativa de la carga de placas amiloides y una ralentización de la progresión clínica de la enfermedad en etapas tempranas. El texto analiza también aspectos de seguridad, especialmente las anomalías de imagen relacionadas con amiloide (ARIA), que presentan mayor incidencia en pacientes tratados, particularmente en portadores del genotipo APOE ε4 homocigoto. Esto subraya la necesidad de implementar cribado genético y monitorización con resonancia magnética. Se enfatiza que el tratamiento está indicado únicamente en pacientes con deterioro cognitivo leve o demencia leve, y no en fases avanzadas o en poblaciones sin evidencia suficiente de beneficio. Además, se resalta el papel clave de los biomarcadores para confirmar la patología amiloide y seleccionar candidatos adecuados. Finalmente, se recomienda una cuidadosa selección de pacientes y estrategias de seguimiento para optimizar la seguridad y eficacia del tratamiento.

Key findings

Why it matters

These recommendations state that donanemab is indicated only for patients with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia, not advanced stages, and that biomarkers are needed to confirm amyloid pathology and select candidates. They highlight ARIA as a safety concern with higher incidence in treated patients, particularly APOE ε4 homozygotes, requiring genetic screening and MRI monitoring.

Study details

How this study scored 28/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 27 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 28 of 100. Total 28 of 100.27 of the 96 points we could judge = 28 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 27 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 28 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Acta neurológica colombiana)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Acta neurológica colombiana: journal h-index 11 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Tatiana Gabriela Aldaz-López holds only 1 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Universidad San Francisco de Quito: institution h-index 164 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 27 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 27 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 28 out of 100.
Total 28 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Bombón-Albán, P. E., & Aldaz-López, T. G. (2026). Recomendaciones de uso de donanemab. Acta neurológica colombiana. https://doi.org/10.22379/anc.1993

Vancouver

Bombón-Albán PE, Aldaz-López TG. Recomendaciones de uso de donanemab. Acta neurológica colombiana. 2026. doi:10.22379/anc.1993.

BibTeX

@article{bombonalban2026-ef1b4e53,
  author  = {Bombón-Albán, Paulina Elizabeth and Aldaz-López, Tatiana Gabriela},
  title   = {{Recomendaciones de uso de donanemab}},
  journal = {Acta neurológica colombiana},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.22379/anc.1993},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.22379/anc.1993}
}

Related studies in Treatments

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →