Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 35 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

The participants controlled the EEG Switch above chance level across all tasks. Success rates correlated with task difficulty and showed individual differences, suggesting that cognitive ability influences performance. In addition, we compared the pattern-matching method for ERP decoding with the conventional peak-based approaches. The pattern-matching method yielded a consistently higher accuracy and was more sensitive to task complexity and individual variability. These results support the potential of the EEG Switch as a reliable, non-motor-dependent cognitive assessment tool. The system is especially useful for populations with limited motor control, such as the elderly or individuals with physical disabilities. While Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) is an important future target for application, the present study involved only healthy adult participants. Future research should examine the sources of individual differences and validate EEG switches in clinical contexts, including clinical trials involving MCI and dementia patients. Our findings lay the groundwork for a novel and accessible approach for cognitive evaluation using neurophysiological data.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that healthy adult participants could control an EEG-based switch above chance level, supporting its potential as a non-motor-dependent cognitive assessment tool. The study involved only healthy adults, so it is preliminary and does not yet show any use in treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 35/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 35 of 100.35 of 100 points earned65 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Brain Sciences)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Brain Sciences: journal h-index 115 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.1× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Shinya Watanabe: h-index 33 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Nagoya University: institution h-index 758 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41008292)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 35 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

HASEGAWA, R. P., & Watanabe, S. (2025). Neurodetector: EEG-Based Cognitive Assessment Using Event-Related Potentials as a Virtual Switch. Brain Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090931

Vancouver

HASEGAWA RP, Watanabe S. Neurodetector: EEG-Based Cognitive Assessment Using Event-Related Potentials as a Virtual Switch. Brain Sciences. 2025. doi:10.3390/brainsci15090931. PMID: 41008292.

BibTeX

@article{hasegawa2025-41008292,
  author  = {HASEGAWA, Ryohei P and Watanabe, Shinya},
  title   = {{Neurodetector: EEG-Based Cognitive Assessment Using Event-Related Potentials as a Virtual Switch}},
  journal = {Brain Sciences},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3390/brainsci15090931},
  pmid    = {41008292},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15090931}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 14.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →