Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 35 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Efficient screening tools for cognitive decline and dementia are in high demand. We previously reported on a novel cognitive assessment tool using eye-tracking technology and its utility in dementia screening. In this study, we developed a tablet version of the eye-tracking-based cognitive assessment (ETCA) app and conducted a clinical trial to verify its clinical utility as software as a medical device (SaMD). Participants with and without dementia were enrolled between December 1, 2020, and July 31, 2021. They used the ETCA app and completed the most widely applied screening test, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), on the same day. The primary outcome was the correlation between the ETCA and MMSE scores. The key secondary outcomes were the administration time for the ETCA, questionnaire-based assessments of test-related burdens, and correlations of the subscores. Performance for detecting dementia was evaluated exploratorily. Analyses of the full analysis set population revealed a strong positive correlation in total scores between the tests (r = 0.831; 95% CI, 0.743-0.891; p < 0.0001). The median ETCA administration time was 254.0 s, and more than 70% of participants reported experiencing less or a similar test-related burden with the ECTA app, compared to the MMSE. Significant correlations were observed for all subscores. The ETCA achieved an area under the curve of 0.864 in detecting participants with dementia. These results verified the clinical utility of the tablet-based ETCA app as a rapid cognitive assessment tool. Based on the results, the ETCA app has obtained regulatory approval as SaMD.

Key findings

Why it matters

This clinical trial found that a tablet-based eye-tracking cognitive assessment correlated strongly with the Mini-Mental State Examination and was well tolerated. It supports the tool's utility for rapid cognitive screening, but it does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention for Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 35/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 35 of 100.35 of 100 points earned65 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (GeroScience)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 GeroScience: journal h-index 83 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Shuko Takeda: h-index 35 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 The University of Osaka: institution h-index 1,138 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41116086)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 35 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Takami, Y., Miki, T., Takeya, Y., Rakugi, H., Morishita, R., & Takeda, S. (2025). Eye-tracking-based tablet application for enhanced cognitive assessment: a clinical trial for software as a medical device (SaMD). GeroScience. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01941-x

Vancouver

Takami Y, Miki T, Takeya Y, Rakugi H, Morishita R, Takeda S. Eye-tracking-based tablet application for enhanced cognitive assessment: a clinical trial for software as a medical device (SaMD). GeroScience. 2025. doi:10.1007/s11357-025-01941-x. PMID: 41116086.

BibTeX

@article{takami2025-41116086,
  author  = {Takami, Yoichi and Miki, Tetsuro and Takeya, Yasushi and Rakugi, Hiromi and Morishita, Ryuichi and Takeda, Shuko},
  title   = {{Eye-tracking-based tablet application for enhanced cognitive assessment: a clinical trial for software as a medical device (SaMD)}},
  journal = {GeroScience},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s11357-025-01941-x},
  pmid    = {41116086},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11357-025-01941-x}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →