Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 68 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Objective To develop and evaluate a model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET with high generalizability. Methods Three thousand twenty-seven individuals (1,763 cognitively unimpaired [CU], 658 impaired, 467 with Alzheimer disease [AD] dementia, 111 with non-AD dementia, and 28 with missing diagnosis) from 6 cohorts (European Medical Information Framework for AD, Alzheimer's and Family, Alzheimer's Biomarkers in Daily Practice, Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, Open Access Series of Imaging Studies [OASIS]-3, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative [ADNI]) who underwent amyloid PET were retrospectively included; 1,049 individuals had follow-up scans. With application of dataset-specific cutoffs to global standard uptake value ratio (SUVr) values from 27 regions, single-tracer and pooled multitracer regional rankings were constructed from the frequency of abnormality across 400 CU individuals (100 per tracer). The pooled multitracer ranking was used to create a staging model consisting of 4 clusters of regions because it displayed a high and consistent correlation with each single-tracer ranking. Relationships between amyloid stage, clinical variables, and longitudinal cognitive decline were investigated. Results SUVr abnormality was most frequently observed in cingulate, followed by orbitofrontal, precuneal, and insular cortices and then the associative, temporal, and occipital regions. Abnormal amyloid levels based on binary global SUVr classification were observed in 1.0%, 5.5%, 17.9%, 90.0%, and 100.0% of individuals in stage 0 to 4, respectively. Baseline stage predicted decline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (ADNI: n = 867, F = 67.37, p F = 9.12, p stage1 2.00, HR stage2 3.53, HR stage3 4.55, HR stage4 9.91, p stage4 4.80, p Conclusion The pooled multitracer staging model successfully classified the level of amyloid burden in >3,000 individuals across cohorts and radiotracers and detects preglobal amyloid burden and distinct risk profiles of cognitive decline within globally amyloid-positive individuals.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study developed a model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET, finding that amyloid abnormality appeared first in the cingulate and then spread to other regions. It is about staging and measurement, not about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer disease.

Study details

How this study scored 68/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 68 of 100.68 of 100 points earned32 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 867 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 101 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 12.6 citations a year over 8 year(s) since 2020
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 8.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 7 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 47 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Natàlia Vilor‐Tejedor: h-index 31 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University College London: institution h-index 2,029 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 7 institution(s) in 4 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32675080)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 68 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Collij, L. E., Heeman, F., Salvadó, G., Ingala, S., Altomare, D., de Wilde, A., et al. (2020). Multitracer model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET imaging. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000010256

Vancouver

Collij LE, Heeman F, Salvadó G, Ingala S, Altomare D, de Wilde A, et al. Multitracer model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET imaging. Neurology. 2020. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000010256. PMID: 32675080.

BibTeX

@article{collij2020-32675080,
  author  = {Collij, L. E. and Heeman, F. and Salvadó, G. and Ingala, S. and Altomare, D. and de Wilde, A. and Konijnenberg, E. and van Buchem, M. and others},
  title   = {{Multitracer model for staging cortical amyloid deposition using PET imaging}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {2020},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.0000000000010256},
  pmid    = {32675080},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000010256}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 15.

Later studies that cite this one

7 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →