Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Plain-language summary

The occurrence of +1 frameshifted proteins, such as amyloid precursor protein (APP+1) and ubiquitin-B (UBB+1) in Down syndrome (DS) has been linked to the onset of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In DS and AD patients, but also in elderly non-demented persons, these co-called +1 proteins accumulate in the neuropathological hallmarks (neurofibrillary tangles, dystrophic neurites of the neuritic plaques and neuropil threads) and may have deleterious effects on neuronal function. Frameshifts are caused by dinucleotide deletions in GAGAG motifs in messenger RNA and are now thought to be the result of unfaithful transcription of normal DNA by a novel process termed "molecular misreading". In the present review some of the critical events in molecular misreading are discussed, the emphasis being on DS.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Low

This is a narrative review. This review describes how +1 frameshifted proteins such as APP+1 and UBB+1 accumulate in the neuropathological hallmarks of Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease and may harm neuronal function, caused by a process the authors call molecular misreading. It is a discussion of a proposed disease mechanism and does not report or test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

van Leeuwen, F. W., & Hol, E. M. (1999). Molecular misreading of genes in Down syndrome as a model for the Alzheimer type of neurodegeneration. Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6380-1_9

Vancouver

van Leeuwen FW, Hol EM. Molecular misreading of genes in Down syndrome as a model for the Alzheimer type of neurodegeneration. Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum. 1999. doi:10.1007/978-3-7091-6380-1_9. PMID: 10666673.

BibTeX

@article{vanleeuwen1999-10666673,
  author  = {van Leeuwen, F. W. and Hol, E. M.},
  title   = {{Molecular misreading of genes in Down syndrome as a model for the Alzheimer type of neurodegeneration}},
  journal = {Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum},
  year    = {1999},
  doi     = {10.1007/978-3-7091-6380-1_9},
  pmid    = {10666673},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6380-1_9}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review describes how +1 frameshifted proteins such as APP+1 and UBB+1 accumulate in the neuropathological hallmarks of Down syndrome and Alzheimer's disease and may harm neuronal function, caused by a process the authors call molecular misreading. It is a discussion of a proposed disease mechanism and does not report or test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 31/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 29 of the 93 points it could be judged on, which is 31 of 100. Total 31 of 100.29 of the 93 points we could judge = 31 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 29 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 31 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of neural transmission. Supplementum)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1999 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 10 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.3 citations a year over 29 year(s) since 1999
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Elly M. Hol: h-index 68 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 10666673)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 29 / 93 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 29 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 31 out of 100.
Total 31 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's from nearby years

Also tagged “down”

527 studies in the library carry the topic tag “down”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 527 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Down syndrome and Alzheimer's

See all studies in Down syndrome and Alzheimer's →