Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. How common it is

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Purpose of review As individuals age, the quality of cognitive function becomes an increasingly important topic. The concept of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) has evolved over the past 2 decades to represent a state of cognitive function between that seen in normal aging and dementia. As such, it is important for health care providers to be aware of the condition and place it in the appropriate clinical context. Recent findings Numerous international population-based studies have been conducted to document the frequency of MCI, estimating its prevalence to be between 15% and 20% in persons 60 years and older, making it a common condition encountered by clinicians. The annual rate in which MCI progresses to dementia varies between 8% and 15% per year, implying that it is an important condition to identify and treat. In those MCI cases destined to develop Alzheimer disease, biomarkers are emerging to help identify etiology and predict progression. However, not all MCI is due to Alzheimer disease, and identifying subtypes is important for possible treatment and counseling. If treatable causes are identified, the person with MCI might improve. Summary MCI is an important clinical entity to identify, and while uncertainties persist, clinicians need to be aware of its diagnostic features to enable them to counsel patients. MCI remains an active area of research as numerous randomized controlled trials are being conducted to develop effective treatments.

Key findings

Why it matters

This review describes mild cognitive impairment as a state between normal aging and dementia, with prevalence of 15% to 20% in people 60 and older and annual progression to dementia of 8% to 15%. It notes that not all mild cognitive impairment is due to Alzheimer's disease and that treatable causes may improve, but it does not present a treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 31 of the 68 points it could be judged on, which is 46 of 100. Total 46 of 100.31 of the 68 points we could judge = 46 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here and still being cited, so those were left out: it earned 31 of the 68 points we could judge it on, which is 46 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.))
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2016 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 Citation count not trusted: 13 of 42 library studies citing it were published more than a year before it - a sign OpenAlex merged several works under this DOI — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Library citations not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Ronald Carl Petersen: h-index 209 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Mayo Clinic: institution h-index 1,606 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 27042901)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 31 / 68 Scored on 14 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 68 points we could judge it on is 46 out of 100.
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Petersen, R. C. (2016). Mild Cognitive Impairment. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.). https://doi.org/10.1212/con.0000000000000313

Vancouver

Petersen RC. Mild Cognitive Impairment. Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.). 2016. doi:10.1212/con.0000000000000313. PMID: 27042901.

BibTeX

@article{petersen2016-27042901,
  author  = {Petersen, R. C.},
  title   = {{Mild Cognitive Impairment}},
  journal = {Continuum (Minneapolis, Minn.)},
  year    = {2016},
  doi     = {10.1212/con.0000000000000313},
  pmid    = {27042901},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/con.0000000000000313}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 79.

Later studies that cite this one

42 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in How common it is

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →