Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100. How common it is

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common cause of dementia. Much is known concerning AD pathophysiology but our understanding of the disease at the systems level remains incomplete. Previous AD research has used resting-state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fcMRI) to assess the integrity of functional networks within the brain. Most studies have focused on the default-mode network (DMN), a primary locus of AD pathology. However, other brain regions are inevitably affected with disease progression. We studied rs-fcMRI in five functionally defined brain networks within a large cohort of human participants of either gender (n = 510) that ranged in AD severity from unaffected [clinical dementia rating (CDR) 0] to very mild (CDR 0.5) to mild (CDR 1). We observed loss of correlations within not only the DMN but other networks at CDR 0.5. Within the salience network (SAL), increases were seen between CDR 0 and CDR 0.5. However, at CDR 1, all networks, including SAL, exhibited reduced correlations. Specific networks were preferentially affected at certain CDR stages. In addition, cross-network relations were consistently lost with increasing AD severity. Our results demonstrate that AD is associated with widespread loss of both intranetwork and internetwork correlations. These results provide insight into AD pathophysiology and reinforce an integrative view of the brain's functional organization.

Key findings

Why it matters

This imaging study found that as Alzheimer's disease severity increased, connections within and between brain networks were lost, with changes appearing even at the very mild stage. It describes how the disease affects brain networks over its course but does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 59/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 59 of 100.59 of 100 points earned41 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Journal of Neuroscience: journal h-index 651 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2012 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 510 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 597 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 37.3 citations a year over 16 year(s) since 2012
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 20.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 18 other studies in this library
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 103 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Beau M. Ances: h-index 81 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Washington University in St. Louis: institution h-index 1,962 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 22745490)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 59 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Brier, M. R., Thomas, J. B., Snyder, A. Z., Benzinger, T. L., Zhang, D., Raichle, M. E., et al. (2012). Loss of intranetwork and internetwork resting state functional connections with Alzheimer's disease progression. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5698-11.2012

Vancouver

Brier MR, Thomas JB, Snyder AZ, Benzinger TL, Zhang D, Raichle ME, et al. Loss of intranetwork and internetwork resting state functional connections with Alzheimer's disease progression. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2012. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5698-11.2012. PMID: 22745490.

BibTeX

@article{brier2012-22745490,
  author  = {Brier, M. R. and Thomas, J. B. and Snyder, A. Z. and Benzinger, T. L. and Zhang, D. and Raichle, M. E. and Holtzman, D. M. and Morris, J. C. and others},
  title   = {{Loss of intranetwork and internetwork resting state functional connections with Alzheimer's disease progression}},
  journal = {The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience},
  year    = {2012},
  doi     = {10.1523/jneurosci.5698-11.2012},
  pmid    = {22745490},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.5698-11.2012}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 15.

Later studies that cite this one

18 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in How common it is

Also in How common it is

80 studies in the library are filed under How common it is with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The How common it is hub.

Similar studies

More on How common it is

See all studies in How common it is →