Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Biomarkers

Topic: Genetics and APOE

Circulating long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) might serve as biomarkers for different pathological conditions. BACE1-AS lncRNA upregulates in the brain of people with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and might be detected in the bloodstream. To reveal if lncRNA BACE1-AS may serve as a blood-based biomarker for AD, we compared its levels in plasma and plasma-derived exosomes between AD (n = 45) and healthy people (n = 36). Exosomes were purified from plasma by Invitrogen™ Total Exosome Isolation Kit and characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and dynamic light scattering (DLS). Total RNA was extracted from whole plasma, and plasma-derived exosomes using TRIzol® LS or TRIzol® Reagents respectively were then reverse transcribed to the cDNA using PrimeScript II cDNA synthesis kit. The BACE1-AS levels were quantified by real-time PCR, and their biomarker potencies were evaluated using ROC curve analysis. Results obtained verified the presence of BACE1-AS in the plasma samples of both AD and healthy controls. We did not observe any significant differences between the levels of BACE1-AS in the plasma or plasma-derived exosomes of AD and control people. However, there were significant differences between AD subgroups and control in the whole plasma samples. The BACE1-AS level was low in pre-AD subgroup but it was high in full-AD people compared to the healthy controls. Moreover, ROC curve analysis revealed that lncRNA BACE1-AS may discriminate pre-AD and healthy control (75% sensitivity and 100% specificity), full-AD and healthy control (68% sensitivity and 100% specificity), and pre-AD and full-AD subgroups (78% sensitivity and 100% specificity), highlighting its potential as a biomarker for AD development. In conclusion, plasma BACE1-AS level may serve as a potent blood-based biomarker for Alzheimer's disease.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 45/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 26 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 45 of 100. Total 45 of 100.26 of the 58 points we could judge = 45 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 45 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2019 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 45 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 31264051)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 26 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 45 out of 100.
Total 45 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Fotuhi, S. N., Khalaj-Kondori, M., Hoseinpour Feizi, M. A., & Talebi, M. (2019). Long Non-coding RNA BACE1-AS May Serve as an Alzheimer's Disease Blood-Based Biomarker. Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01364-2

Vancouver

Fotuhi SN, Khalaj-Kondori M, Hoseinpour Feizi MA, Talebi M. Long Non-coding RNA BACE1-AS May Serve as an Alzheimer's Disease Blood-Based Biomarker. Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN. 2019. doi:10.1007/s12031-019-01364-2. PMID: 31264051.

BibTeX

@article{fotuhi2019-31264051,
  author  = {Fotuhi, S. N. and Khalaj-Kondori, M. and Hoseinpour Feizi, M. A. and Talebi, M.},
  title   = {{Long Non-coding RNA BACE1-AS May Serve as an Alzheimer's Disease Blood-Based Biomarker}},
  journal = {Journal of molecular neuroscience : MN},
  year    = {2019},
  doi     = {10.1007/s12031-019-01364-2},
  pmid    = {31264051},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-019-01364-2}
}

Related studies in Biomarkers

Also tagged “epigenetic”

274 studies in the library carry the topic tag “epigenetic”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 274 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Biomarkers

See all studies in Biomarkers →