Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Digital health tools

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

In last two decades the growing life expectancy has spiralled the prevalence of neurogenerative disorder such as Dementia among elderly population posing a significant challenge to mental health globally. The dementia is generally characterized by progressive cognitive decline which it affects memory, thinking, behaviour, and the ability to perform everyday activities. Early diagnosis and intervention are crucial for improving patient outcomes and managing the societal burden of dementia. The primary aim of this study is to deploy various machine learning models such as Logistic Regression, K-Nearest Neighbour (KNN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Decision Tree, Random Forest (RF). Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for the classification of Dementia. The suitable features required for the classification is determined through efficient filter-based and wrapper-based feature selection techniques. The experimental evaluation of machine learning models is performed using standard metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall and F1 score. Furthermore, Explainable AI (XAI) techniques such as SHAP and LIME are employed to interpret the black-box nature of these models, offering transparency and insights into the contribution of individual features to the model predictions. The thorough evaluation of machine learning models exhibited that Random Forest outperforms other models with an accuracy of 96%, with CDR identified as a key predictor through XAI analysis.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study compared several machine learning models for classifying dementia and used explainability techniques to interpret their predictions, with Random Forest performing best. It is a classification study and does not treat, cure, or prevent Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 31/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 30 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 31 of 100. Total 31 of 100.30 of the 96 points we could judge = 31 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 30 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 31 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International Journal of Applied Sciences & Development)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 International Journal of Applied Sciences & Development: journal h-index 4 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Omkar Prabhu holds only 8 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Manipal Academy of Higher Education: institution h-index 310 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 30 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 30 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 31 out of 100.
Total 31 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Kumar, R. R., Manoj, T., Shetty, S., & Prabhu, O. (2025). Leveraging Explainable AI for Dementia Classification: A Machine Learning Approach. International Journal of Applied Sciences & Development. https://doi.org/10.37394/232029.2025.4.3

Vancouver

Kumar RR, Manoj T, Shetty S, Prabhu O. Leveraging Explainable AI for Dementia Classification: A Machine Learning Approach. International Journal of Applied Sciences & Development. 2025. doi:10.37394/232029.2025.4.3.

BibTeX

@article{kumar2025-50f19073,
  author  = {Kumar, R Ram and Manoj, T and Shetty, Sucharitha and Prabhu, Omkar},
  title   = {{Leveraging Explainable AI for Dementia Classification: A Machine Learning Approach}},
  journal = {International Journal of Applied Sciences \& Development},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.37394/232029.2025.4.3},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.37394/232029.2025.4.3}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Digital health tools

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Digital health tools

See all studies in Digital health tools →