Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract Background Family caregiving for dementia patients is a challenging task, with profound effects on caregivers’ physical and mental well-being. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of Kolb’s experiential learning theory on the caregiving burden and psychological status of caregivers for dementia patients. Methods This study enrolled 110 caregivers of nursing dementia patients. These caregivers were divided into two groups: a control group ( n = 55) and an intervention group ( n = 55). The control group received routine care, while the intervention group received nursing based on Kolb’s experiential learning theory in addition to routine care. Changes in caregiving burden and psychological status were compared between the two groups before and after the intervention. Result The results showed that after the intervention, the intervention group’s caregivers had significantly lower scores on the caregiver burden inventory dimensions and total score compared to the control group ( P < 0.05). Additionally, the intervention group’s self-assessment scores on the self-rating anxiety scale and self-rating depression scale were also lower than those of the control group ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Kolb’s experiential learning theory has a positive impact on alleviating the caregiving burden and reducing anxiety and depression among family caregivers of dementia patients.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Xu, Y., Lu, J. X., Yu, X., & Ding, H. (2025). Impact of Kolb’s experiential learning theory-based nursing on caregiver burden and psychological state of caregivers of dementia patients. Open Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2025-1157

Vancouver

Xu Y, Lu JX, Yu X, Ding H. Impact of Kolb’s experiential learning theory-based nursing on caregiver burden and psychological state of caregivers of dementia patients. Open Medicine. 2025. doi:10.1515/med-2025-1157. PMID: 40061831.

BibTeX

@article{xu2025-40061831,
  author  = {Xu, Yue and Lu, Jian Xiong and Yu, Xinting and Ding, Heguo},
  title   = {{Impact of Kolb’s experiential learning theory-based nursing on caregiver burden and psychological state of caregivers of dementia patients}},
  journal = {Open Medicine},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1515/med-2025-1157},
  pmid    = {40061831},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2025-1157}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study of 110 caregivers found that nursing based on Kolb's experiential learning theory significantly lowered caregiver burden scores and reduced anxiety and depression compared with routine care. The findings concern caregiver support and do not address treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 38 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 40 of 100. Total 40 of 100.38 of the 96 points we could judge = 40 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Open Medicine)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Open Medicine: journal h-index 48 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 55 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 5 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 5.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 5 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Heguo Ding holds only 2 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Huzhou Normal University: institution h-index 165 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40061831)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 38 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100.
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Caregiving

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →