Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 42 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

This paper examined the emotional impact of diagnosis disclosure on recently diagnosed people with dementia. Thirty patient/caregiver dyads attending a Geriatric Day Hospital Program in Ottawa, Canada participated in this qualitative exploratory study. Data sources included: (a) audio-tapes of diagnosis disclosure meeting, (b) in-depth interviews with patients and caregivers within one week of disclosure, and (c) focus group interviews with caregivers within one month. Patients exhibited a range of emotional responses which can be divided into three broad categories: (a) responses suggesting a lack of insight and/or an active denial of the diagnosis, (b) grief reactions/emotional crisis related to the experience of actual or anticipated losses associated with dementia, and (c) positive coping responses to maximize the disease outcome. Participants went through stages of emotional response to their diagnosis: not noticing symptoms, noticing & covering up, or noticing & revealing; diagnostic process & disclosure; confirming or shock; denial, crisis, or maximizing; disorganization or adaptation. There is a need to develop a better understanding of the experience of people with dementia at the critical point of diagnosis disclosure in order to design supportive interventions to maximize adaptive coping responses.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Aminzadeh, F., Byszewski, A., Molnar, F. J., & Eisner, M. (2007). Emotional impact of dementia diagnosis: exploring persons with dementia and caregivers' perspectives. Aging & mental health. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860600963695

Vancouver

Aminzadeh F, Byszewski A, Molnar FJ, Eisner M. Emotional impact of dementia diagnosis: exploring persons with dementia and caregivers' perspectives. Aging & mental health. 2007. doi:10.1080/13607860600963695. PMID: 17558579.

BibTeX

@article{aminzadeh2007-17558579,
  author  = {Aminzadeh, F. and Byszewski, A. and Molnar, F. J. and Eisner, M.},
  title   = {{Emotional impact of dementia diagnosis: exploring persons with dementia and caregivers' perspectives}},
  journal = {Aging \& mental health},
  year    = {2007},
  doi     = {10.1080/13607860600963695},
  pmid    = {17558579},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1080/13607860600963695}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This qualitative study of 30 patient/caregiver dyads found that people with dementia show a range of emotional responses to diagnosis disclosure, including denial, grief reactions, and positive coping. It suggests a need for supportive interventions at the point of diagnosis to help maximize adaptive coping responses.

Study details

How this study scored 42/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 40 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 42 of 100. Total 42 of 100.40 of the 96 points we could judge = 42 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 40 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 42 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Aging & mental health)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Aging & Mental Health: journal h-index 153 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2007 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 228 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 10.9 citations a year over 21 year(s) since 2007
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 3.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 9 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 38 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Marg Eisner holds only 6 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Ottawa: institution h-index 908 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 17558579)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 40 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 40 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 42 out of 100.
Total 42 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

9 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Caregiving from nearby years

Also tagged “nursing”

995 studies in the library carry the topic tag “nursing”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 995 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →