Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Caregiving

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Objective To describe the relative frequency of selected comorbidities in 2 population based prevalence cohorts of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) compared to age and sex matched community controls. Methods Using the population based data resources of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we assembled 3 prevalence cohorts of all residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, with RA (1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria) and age and sex matched controls without arthritis on January 1, 1965, January 1, 1975, and January 1, 1985. Cases and controls were followed longitudinally through their complete (inpatient and outpatient) medical records beginning 10 years prior to the prevalence (or index) date until death, migration from the county, or January 1, 1995. Comorbidity was assessed yearly using the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Index of Co-existent Diseases (ICED). Descriptive statistics were used to illustrate the baseline characteristics of the study population and the frequency of individual comorbidities in each of the 3 groups over the followup period. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess the risk for each individual comorbidity among patients with arthritis compared to controls and to identify significant predictors of an increase in comorbidity level over time. Results Our study population included 450 RA, 441 OA, and 891 control subjects. The age and sex distributions of cases and their controls were similar. Over the followup period, patients with RA had a higher likelihood of developing congestive heart failure, chronic pulmonary disease, dementia, and peptic ulcer disease, while cases with OA had a significantly higher risk of developing peptic ulcer disease and renal disease. Among patients with either RA or OA, age, male sex, and baseline comorbidity were significant predictors of a rise in comorbidity. The presence of RA was a highly significant predictor of a rise in comorbidity from one year to the next, even after controlling for the effects of age, sex, and baseline comorbidity (p = 0.0004 for the Charlson and p = 0.006 for the ICED). Conclusion These data indicate that the burden of illness among people with arthritis is higher than for nonarthritics and that this burden appears to be increasing over time, particularly in RA. These results suggest that specialized chronic disease care will be increasingly important for the future health care needs of people with RA.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study describes the frequency of other medical conditions in people with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis compared with controls. It does not concern Alzheimer's disease at all and has no implications for treating, curing, or preventing it.

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 38 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 40 of 100. Total 40 of 100.38 of the 96 points we could judge = 40 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, so that was left out: it earned 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The Journal of rheumatology)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1999 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 2 / 4 450 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 101 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 3.5 citations a year over 29 year(s) since 1999
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author O'Fallon Wm: h-index 13 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Mayo Clinic: institution h-index 1,606 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 10555912)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 38 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100.
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no DOI, so the citation leaves it out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Gabriel, S. E., Crowson, C. S., & O'Fallon, W. M. (1999). Comorbidity in arthritis. The Journal of rheumatology.

Vancouver

Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, O'Fallon WM. Comorbidity in arthritis. The Journal of rheumatology. 1999. PMID: 10555912.

BibTeX

@article{gabriel1999-10555912,
  author  = {Gabriel, S. E. and Crowson, C. S. and O'Fallon, W. M.},
  title   = {{Comorbidity in arthritis}},
  journal = {The Journal of rheumatology},
  year    = {1999},
  pmid    = {10555912}
}

Related studies in Caregiving

Similar studies

More on Caregiving

See all studies in Caregiving →