Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100. Disease mechanisms

Topic: Gut, metabolism and diet

Emerging evidence suggests a potential role of gut dysbiosis in neurodegenerative disorders and, in particular, Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology and cognitive decline. However, the role of gut microbiome in the early prodromal stages of AD and particularly in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) remains understudied and has been mostly explored in Asian populations with no representation of European populations. To address this research gap in the literature and to suggest novel microbiome features associated with MCI, we conducted a cross-sectional study in a European population sample and profiled gut microbiota in 99 individuals without dementia through 16s ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing. Individuals were categorized by cognitive status based on standard clinical criteria to cognitively normal (n = 49) or individuals with MCI (n = 50). Differential abundance through Microbiome Multivariable Associations with Linear model (MaAsLin2) and elastic net logistic regression analyses were used to identify gut microbiome features associated with MCI. MCI group was older than the CN group and age was used as covariate in the differential abundance analysis. No differences in alpha and beta diversity were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). At false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05, we identified specific genera associated with MCI, mostly linked to short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) production (e.g., Candidatus_Soleaferrea q = 0.027, MaAsLin2 coefficient = 1.65, Sellimonas q = 0.017, MaAsLin2 coefficient = -4.45), while we highlight nominal (p < 0.05, q > 0.05) correlations of genera (e.g., Hydrogenoanaerobacterium, Subdoligranulum) with metrics of cognitive assessment. Microbiota was shown to have a fairly good discriminative capacity for MCI status (area under the curve AUC = 0.77), with Rothia genus found as the top predictor for MCI (beta coefficient [95% confidence intervals] = 0.224 [0.216-0.233]). Overall, our findings add to current knowledge reporting gut microbiome alterations in MCI by suggesting novel associated microbiome features; however, larger scale longitudinal studies are needed to further elucidate the underlying biological pathways linked to the disease.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Rouskas, K., Mamalaki, E., Ntanasi, E., Pantoura, M., Anezaki, M., Emmanouil, C., et al. (2025). Gut Microbiome Alterations in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Findings from the ALBION Greek Cohort. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092112

Vancouver

Rouskas K, Mamalaki E, Ntanasi E, Pantoura M, Anezaki M, Emmanouil C, et al. Gut Microbiome Alterations in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Findings from the ALBION Greek Cohort. Microorganisms. 2025. doi:10.3390/microorganisms13092112. PMID: 41011443.

BibTeX

@article{rouskas2025-41011443,
  author  = {Rouskas, Konstantinos and Mamalaki, Eirini and Ntanasi, Eva and Pantoura, Marianna and Anezaki, Maria and Emmanouil, Christina and Novau-Ferré, Nil and Bulló, Mònica and others},
  title   = {{Gut Microbiome Alterations in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Findings from the ALBION Greek Cohort}},
  journal = {Microorganisms},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.3390/microorganisms13092112},
  pmid    = {41011443},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13092112}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Study details

How this study scored 66/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 4 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 37 of the 56 points it could be judged on, which is 66 of 100. Total 66 of 100.37 of the 56 points we could judge = 66 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 37 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 66 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Microorganisms)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 4 / 12 A snapshot of people at one point in time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 49 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41011443)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 37 / 56 Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 37 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 66 out of 100.
Total 66 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Related studies in Disease mechanisms

Also tagged “dysbiosis”

173 studies in the library carry the topic tag “dysbiosis”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 173 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Disease mechanisms

See all studies in Disease mechanisms →