Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background Dementia is a significant health concern among older people, necessitating an understanding of its spatial distribution and its ties to demographic and socioeconomic factors. Objective This study examines the spatial pattern of dementia mortality across U.S. counties and investigates its associations with relevant demographic and socioeconomic variables. Methods We analyzed 2019 county-level dementia mortality data for people aged 60 and older in U.S. counties. Using geospatial techniques, we examined the relationships between dementia mortality and pertinent demographic and socioeconomic factors. It is worth noting that 40.31% of the U.S. counties were dropped due to missing data. Results Dementia mortality rates varied geographically, with clusters of high rates in the South, Midwest, and Maine. Across the nation, the median income of a county was found to have a significant negative effect on dementia mortality, while the percentage of persons 60 years and older was positively associated in most areas except the West Coast. Race did not appear to be significantly associated in most areas but was found significant in the New England area and some counties in the Midwest. The percentage of rural population was also only significant in selected regions, mostly the Northeast and Florida. Conclusions This study highlights diverse links between dementia mortality and demographic and socioeconomic factors at the county level in the United States. Understanding these connections, considering spatial variations and scales, is crucial for tailored strategies to address dementia disparities nationwide. Geographically weighted models are valuable for analyzing such spatial data in future research.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Roozkhosh, F., Yao, X. A., Yang, H., Song, S., & Liu, T. (2024). Geospatial analysis of dementia mortality and its associations with demographic and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports. https://doi.org/10.3233/adr-240107

Vancouver

Roozkhosh F, Yao XA, Yang H, Song S, Liu T. Geospatial analysis of dementia mortality and its associations with demographic and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports. 2024. doi:10.3233/adr-240107.

BibTeX

@article{roozkhosh2024-35a6b3bf,
  author  = {Roozkhosh, Farnoosh and Yao, Xiaobai Angela and Yang, Hao and Song, Suhang and Liu, Tianming},
  title   = {{Geospatial analysis of dementia mortality and its associations with demographic and socioeconomic factors}},
  journal = {Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.3233/adr-240107},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.3233/adr-240107}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This county-level analysis found that dementia mortality rates varied geographically, with clusters of high rates in the South, Midwest, and Maine, and that county median income had a significant negative effect on dementia mortality. The study is about spatial patterns and demographic and socioeconomic associations with dementia mortality, not about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 40/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 40 of 100.40 of 100 points earned60 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports: journal h-index 40 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 2,019 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.2 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Tianming Liu: h-index 66 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Georgia: institution h-index 904 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 40 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →