Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 37 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract Background Data on dementia mortality are routinely collected by governments and used in health research. However, historical underrecording of dementia on death certificates has limited the utility of this widely available data source. Considerable effort has been invested in raising awareness of dementia, increasing diagnosis rates, and improving dementia recording on death certificates. Updated versions of the ICD‐10 rules for coding the underlying cause of death, implemented in Scotland in 2011 and 2017, have increasingly assigned deaths that mention both dementia and respiratory or urinary tract infections towards an underlying cause of dementia, if no other underlying medical condition is mentioned. Since previous cohort studies have shown geographical variation in dementia risk, this study utilises spatiotemporal modelling to investigate changes in dementia‐associated deaths in Scotland. Method Data on dementia and Alzheimer’s deaths and mid‐year population estimates available from the National Records of Scotland for the time period 2000‐2019 were used to build a Bayesian spatiotemporal disease mapping model. The data were grouped by the 32 Council areas and year, whilst stratification by age and gender were built into the model. The analyses were run in R using Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation methodology. Result The data show strong temporal and spatial trends in the relative risk of dementia‐associated death. The relative risk increases progressively over the time period studied, with a 2.3‐fold increase (95% Confidence Interval: 2.1‐2.5) between 2000 and 2019, reaching levels just below predicted dementia prevalence in recent years. The relative risk varies geographically and is highest in Scotland’s industrialised central belt region and lowest in the rural areas and islands, with a relative risk of 1.9 (95% CI: 1.6‐2.3) between the lowest and highest risk Council areas. Conclusion There are factors, other than the step changes in underlying cause of death coding, driving the progressively increasing temporal trend in relative risk of dementia‐associated death. These factors could be a combination of increased dementia awareness, a larger proportion of people being diagnosed, greater recording on death certificates and, possibly, increasing prevalence. The strong spatial variation in relative risk in Scotland indicates that there are geographically‐varying factors affecting this risk.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Parkinson, L., Lindgren, F., & Russ, T. C. (2021). Spatiotemporal trends in dementia‐associated deaths, what do the data reveal? Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.054409

Vancouver

Parkinson L, Lindgren F, Russ TC. Spatiotemporal trends in dementia‐associated deaths, what do the data reveal? Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2021. doi:10.1002/alz.054409.

BibTeX

@article{parkinson2021-f5b40125,
  author  = {Parkinson, Luisa and Lindgren, Finn and Russ, Tom C.},
  title   = {{Spatiotemporal trends in dementia‐associated deaths, what do the data reveal?}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
  year    = {2021},
  doi     = {10.1002/alz.054409},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.054409}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study used Scottish death records to model geographic and time trends in dementia-associated deaths. It is about mortality data and coding, not about treating, curing or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 37/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 37 of 100.37 of 100 points earned63 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2021 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 7 year(s) since 2021
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Tom C. Russ: h-index 45 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Edinburgh: institution h-index 1,378 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 37 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →