Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 42 out of 100. Mild cognitive impairment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Abstract INTRODUCTION This study investigated gender differences in cognitive reserve (CR) in subjective cognitive decline (SCD) and examined the impact of gender‐CR interaction on the risk of progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). METHODS We enrolled 440 SCD patients and estimated CR using premorbid intelligence (Test di Intelligenza Breve [TIB]). To account for socio‐cultural differences, patients were stratified by birth cohort (pre‐/post‐1950). A Markov random‐field (MRF) model explored relationships between gender, CR, education, and age. Logistic regression assessed MCI progression risk. RESULTS Women showed lower TIB scores than men (p < 0.001). The MRF model revealed an inverse connection between TIB and female gender, while no link was observed between TIB and generation. Progression to MCI was predicted by age at onset (p < 0.001), apolipoprotein E (APOE) status (p = 0.002), and TIB (p = 0.018), but not gender. DISCUSSION Gender has an impact on CR, but not through socio‐economic variables. In turn, CR influenced the risk of MCI progression, whereas gender did not. Highlights Subjective cognitive decline (SCD) women presented lower cognitive reserve (CR) levels than men, despite similar education levels. Social‐cultural factors did not explain these gender differences in CR in SCD. The gender–CR interaction was not mediated by social–cultural factors. The risk of progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) was influenced by CR but not by gender.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found that women with subjective cognitive decline had lower cognitive reserve scores than men, but gender itself did not predict progression to mild cognitive impairment. Cognitive reserve did influence progression risk, suggesting that building reserve might help, though no treatment is tested.

Study details

How this study scored 42/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 42 of 100.42 of 100 points earned58 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring: journal h-index 86 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 2 / 4 440 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Valentina Bessi: h-index 35 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 University of Florence: institution h-index 739 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40881583)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 42 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Giulia, G., Moschini, V., Ceccarelli, A., Padiglioni, S., Morinelli, C., Mazzeo, S., et al. (2025). Gender differences in cognitive reserve: An impact on progression in subjective cognitive decline? Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70174

Vancouver

Giulia G, Moschini V, Ceccarelli A, Padiglioni S, Morinelli C, Mazzeo S, et al. Gender differences in cognitive reserve: An impact on progression in subjective cognitive decline? Alzheimer s & Dementia Diagnosis Assessment & Disease Monitoring. 2025. doi:10.1002/dad2.70174. PMID: 40881583.

BibTeX

@article{giulia2025-40881583,
  author  = {Giulia, Giacomucci and Moschini, Valentina and Ceccarelli, Alice and Padiglioni, Sonia and Morinelli, Carmen and Mazzeo, Salvatore and Crucitti, Chiara and Galdo, Giulia and others},
  title   = {{Gender differences in cognitive reserve: An impact on progression in subjective cognitive decline?}},
  journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia Diagnosis Assessment \& Disease Monitoring},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1002/dad2.70174},
  pmid    = {40881583},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.70174}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment

Also tagged “cognitive-function”

1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Mild cognitive impairment

See all studies in Mild cognitive impairment →