Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Many medical and epidemiological studies use multivariable regression to test whether several independent variables (exposures) are causal determinants of a health outcome. Where mutually adjusted regression coefficients are significant, the exposures are labelled as risk factors for the outcome. We call this study design “factors associated with.” In this article, we argue that this method is flawed due to a lack of reasoning about which variables are treated as confounders, multiple statistical testing, and post hoc interpretation of the results. In some cases, researchers use algorithmic or stepwise approaches to select exposure variables, which further exacerbates these problems. Although the results of factors associated with studies often seem reasonable, these problems mean that the method can also produce implausible results, such as dementia reducing the risk of death in patients admitted to hospital for trauma, 1 diabetes reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism in the general population,2 and lack of food reducing the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder in refugees.3 Many of these studies are published every year, including in well respected journals. We argue that these studies are misleading and contribute to research waste, and the “factors associated with” method should be abandoned.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper argues that the common 'factors associated with' study design, which labels variables as risk factors based on regression results, is flawed and can produce implausible findings. It recommends abandoning this method, which means many reported dementia risk factors from such studies should be treated with caution.

Study details

How this study scored 41/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 2 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 41 of 100.41 of 100 points earned59 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMJ Medicine)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 BMJ Medicine: journal h-index 39 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 19 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 2 / 5 6.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 16.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 19 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author John Pickavance: h-index 6 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University College London: institution h-index 2,029 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41181819)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 41 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Lewer, D., Brothers, T. D., O’Nions, E., & Pickavance, J. (2025). Factors associated with: problems of using exploratory multivariable regression to identify causal risk factors. BMJ Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001375

Vancouver

Lewer D, Brothers TD, O’Nions E, Pickavance J. Factors associated with: problems of using exploratory multivariable regression to identify causal risk factors. BMJ Medicine. 2025. doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001375. PMID: 41181819.

BibTeX

@article{lewer2025-41181819,
  author  = {Lewer, Dan and Brothers, Thomas D. and O’Nions, Elizabeth and Pickavance, John},
  title   = {{Factors associated with: problems of using exploratory multivariable regression to identify causal risk factors}},
  journal = {BMJ Medicine},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001375},
  pmid    = {41181819},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001375}
}

Related studies in Risk factors

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →