Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Plain-language summary

Many studies have examined factors associated with individuals of high or low healthcare spending in a given year. However, few have studied how healthcare spending changes over multiple years and which factors are associated with the changes. In this study, we examined the dynamic patterns of healthcare spending over a three-year period, among a nationally representative cohort of Medicare beneficiaries in the U.S. and identified factors associated with these patterns. We extracted data for 30,729 participants from the national Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS), for the period 2003-2019. Using multistate Markov (MSM) models, we estimated the probabilities of year-to-year transitions in healthcare spending categorized as three states (low (L), medium (M) and high (H)), or to the terminal state, death. The participants, 13,554 (44.1%), 13,715 (44.6%) and 3,460 (11.3%) were in the low, medium and high spending states at baseline, respectively. The majority of participants remained in the same spending category from one year to the next (L-to-L: 76.8%; M-to-M: 71.7%; H-to-H: 56.6 %). Transitions from the low to high spending state were significantly associated with older age (75-84, ≥85 years), residing in a long-term care facility, greater assistance with activities of daily living, enrollment in fee-for-service Medicare, not receiving a flu shot, and presence of specific medical conditions, including cancer, dementia, and heart disease. Using data from a large population-based longitudinal survey, we have demonstrated that MSM modelling is a flexible framework and useful tool for examining changes in healthcare spending over time.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Lihua, L., Serena, Z., Karen, M., Chen, Y., Madhu, M., Kelley Amy, S., et al. (2023). Examining annual transitions in healthcare spending among U.S. medicare beneficiaries using multistate Markov models: Analysis of medicare current beneficiary survey data, 2003-2019. Preventive medicine reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102171

Vancouver

Lihua L, Serena Z, Karen M, Chen Y, Madhu M, Kelley Amy S, et al. Examining annual transitions in healthcare spending among U.S. medicare beneficiaries using multistate Markov models: Analysis of medicare current beneficiary survey data, 2003-2019. Preventive medicine reports. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102171. PMID: 36950178.

BibTeX

@article{lihua2023-36950178,
  author  = {Lihua, Li and Serena, Zhan and Karen, Mckendrick and Chen, Yang and Madhu, Mazumdar and Kelley Amy, S. and Aldridge Melissa, D.},
  title   = {{Examining annual transitions in healthcare spending among U.S. medicare beneficiaries using multistate Markov models: Analysis of medicare current beneficiary survey data, 2003-2019}},
  journal = {Preventive medicine reports},
  year    = {2023},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102171},
  pmid    = {36950178},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102171}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study used national survey data to track how Medicare beneficiaries move between low, medium, and high healthcare spending categories over three years. It is about spending patterns, not about treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 48/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 1 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 48 of 100.48 of 100 points earned52 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Preventive medicine reports)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Preventive Medicine Reports: journal h-index 82 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 30,729 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.4 citations a year over 5 year(s) since 2023
Impact for its field and year 1 / 6 Cited 0.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Melissa D. Aldridge: h-index 26 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai: institution h-index 1,325 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 36950178)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 48 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery from nearby years

Also tagged “palliative”

858 studies in the library carry the topic tag “palliative”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 858 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →