Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Disparities

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is one of the most common causes of stroke worldwide. Among people with stroke, those of East Asia descent and non-White populations in the United States have a higher burden of ICAD-related stroke compared with Whites of European descent. Disparities in the prevalence of asymptomatic ICAD are less marked than with symptomatic ICAD. In addition to stroke, ICAD increases the risk of dementia and cognitive decline, magnifying ICAD societal burden. The risk of stroke recurrence among patients with ICAD-related stroke is the highest among those with confirmed stroke and stenosis ≥70%. In fact, the 1-year recurrent stroke rate of >20% among those with stenosis >70% is one of the highest rates among common causes of stroke. The mechanisms by which ICAD causes stroke include plaque rupture with in situ thrombosis and occlusion or artery-to-artery embolization, hemodynamic injury, and branch occlusive disease. The risk of stroke recurrence varies by the presumed underlying mechanism of stroke, but whether techniques such as quantitative magnetic resonance angiography, computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance perfusion, or transcranial Doppler can help with risk stratification beyond the degree of stenosis is less clear. The diagnosis of ICAD is heavily reliant on lumen-based studies, such as computed tomographic angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, or digital subtraction angiography, but newer technologies, such as high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging, can help distinguish ICAD from stenosing arteriopathies.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Chen, L. H., Spagnolo-Allende, A., Yang, D., Qiao, Y., & Gutierrez, J. (2024). Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Imaging of Atherosclerotic Intracranial Disease. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.123.043630

Vancouver

Chen LH, Spagnolo-Allende A, Yang D, Qiao Y, Gutierrez J. Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Imaging of Atherosclerotic Intracranial Disease. Stroke. 2024. doi:10.1161/strokeaha.123.043630. PMID: 38252756.

BibTeX

@article{chen2024-38252756,
  author  = {Chen, L. H. and Spagnolo-Allende, A. and Yang, D. and Qiao, Y. and Gutierrez, J.},
  title   = {{Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Imaging of Atherosclerotic Intracranial Disease}},
  journal = {Stroke},
  year    = {2024},
  doi     = {10.1161/strokeaha.123.043630},
  pmid    = {38252756},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.123.043630}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Intracranial atherosclerotic disease is a common cause of stroke and also increases the risk of dementia and cognitive decline. This review describes the disease and its mechanisms but does not report a treatment or cure for dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 50/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 3 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multicenter collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 50 of 100.50 of 100 points earned50 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Stroke)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Stroke: journal h-index 455 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 116 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 29.0 citations a year over 4 year(s) since 2024
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 29.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 3 / 4 Cited 114 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author José Gutierrez: h-index 37 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Johns Hopkins University: institution h-index 2,306 (OpenAlex)
Multicenter collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 38252756)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 50 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Disparities

Also tagged “small”

900 studies in the library carry the topic tag “small”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 900 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Disparities

See all studies in Disparities →