Home › Research › Prevention trials
Effects of Virtual Reality Motor-Cognitive Training for Older People With Cognitive Frailty: Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial
Kwan RYC, Liu J, Sin OSK, Fong KNK, Qin J, Wong JCY, Lai C.. Journal of medical Internet research, 2024-09-11
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Results In total, 293 eligible participants enrolled in the study. The effects were not statistically significant on other outcomes.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Kwan, R. Y. C., Liu, J., Sin, O. S. K., Fong, K. N. K., Qin, J., Wong, J. C. Y., et al. (2024). Effects of Virtual Reality Motor-Cognitive Training for Older People With Cognitive Frailty: Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of medical Internet research. https://doi.org/10.2196/57809
Vancouver
Kwan RYC, Liu J, Sin OSK, Fong KNK, Qin J, Wong JCY, et al. Effects of Virtual Reality Motor-Cognitive Training for Older People With Cognitive Frailty: Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of medical Internet research. 2024. doi:10.2196/57809. PMID: 39259959.
BibTeX
@article{kwan2024-39259959,
author = {Kwan, R. Y. C. and Liu, J. and Sin, O. S. K. and Fong, K. N. K. and Qin, J. and Wong, J. C. Y. and Lai, C.},
title = {{Effects of Virtual Reality Motor-Cognitive Training for Older People With Cognitive Frailty: Multicentered Randomized Controlled Trial}},
journal = {Journal of medical Internet research},
year = {2024},
doi = {10.2196/57809},
pmid = {39259959},
url = {https://doi.org/10.2196/57809}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results In total, 293 eligible participants enrolled in the study.
- The effects were not statistically significant on other outcomes.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Prevention →
Study details
- Study designrandomized controlled trial
- Effect size78.2%; 52.1%; 57.2%
- Evidence strengthHigh
How this study scored 80/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a randomised controlled trial. Scored zero for sample size because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 49 of the 61 points we could judge it on, which is 80 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of medical Internet research) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 11 / 12 | A randomised controlled trial |
| Strength of evidence | 5 / 5 | Rated “high” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2024 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (pubmed indexes it as a clinical or observational study) |
| Randomised / blinded | 1 / 2 | Randomised (as stated in the record) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | PubMed indexes it as a multicentre study |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 39259959) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 49 / 61 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 49 of the 61 points we could judge it on is 80 out of 100. |
| Total | 80 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Prevention trials
Also tagged “controlled”
1,116 studies in the library carry the topic tag “controlled”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,116 tagged studies.