Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 56 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background The amount and pattern of physical activity that benefits cognitive health remain unclear. Methods Participants from the UK Biobank cohort who had a full week of accelerometer-based moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and light physical activity (LPA) data were included in the analysis. The data for dementia diagnosis were collected from 2006 to 2024. Associations between the incidence of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), and PA amounts and patterns were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models. The analysis included 1) comparing MVPA gradients with reference group performing less than 150 min/week; 2) classifying MVPA patterns as effective intensive (≥300 min/week with ≥50 % of MVPA in 1-2 days), effective regular (≥300 min/week not up to effective intensive), and ineffective ( Results 91,512 individuals (mean [SD] age, 56.03[7.8] years; 55.9 % female) were included. Compared with participants performing 300 min/week of MVPA was associated with a reduced risk. When stratified at 300 min/week of MVPA, hazard ratios for dementia were 0.73 (95 % CI: 0.60-0.89) for the weekend pattern and 0.79 (95 % CI: 0.64-0.98) for the regular pattern. For ineffective MVPA, engaging in >840 min/week of LPA was associated with lower dementia incidence. Conclusions Accumulating >300 min/week of MVPA, whether concentrated within 1-2 days or distributed evenly across the week, was associated with a decreased risk of dementia. Additionally, higher levels of LPA partially compensated for low MVPA in lowering dementia risk.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Wang, Y., Li, F., Cao, S., & Jia, J. (2025). Dose- and pattern- physical activity is associated with lower risk of dementia. Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100223

Vancouver

Wang Y, Li F, Cao S, Jia J. Dose- and pattern- physical activity is associated with lower risk of dementia. Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100223. PMID: 40514301.

BibTeX

@article{wang2025-40514301,
  author  = {Wang, Y. and Li, F. and Cao, S. and Jia, J.},
  title   = {{Dose- and pattern- physical activity is associated with lower risk of dementia}},
  journal = {Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100223},
  pmid    = {40514301},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2025.100223}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This UK Biobank cohort found that more than 300 minutes per week of moderate-to-vigorous activity was linked to lower dementia risk, whether spread out or concentrated on weekends. It is observational, so it cannot prove that activity prevents dementia.

Study details

Limitations

Observational; single week of measurement; UK Biobank healthy-volunteer effect; thresholds chosen post hoc.

How this study scored 56/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 4 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 55 of the 98 points it could be judged on, which is 56 of 100. Total 56 of 100.55 of the 98 points we could judge = 56 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on free to read, so that was left out: it earned 55 of the 98 points we could judge it on, which is 56 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 63 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A cohort study following people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 4 / 4 91,512 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 8 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 1 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 8 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author Jianping Jia: h-index 61 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 Capital Medical University: institution h-index 643 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40514301)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 55 / 98 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 55 of the 98 points we could judge it on is 56 out of 100.
Total 56 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — PubMed Central lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 10 Oct 2026).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

1 study in the alzhub library lists this one in its references.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →