Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 57 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology

C oronary heart disease (CHD) is the single leading cause of death and a significant cause of morbidity among American women. 1 Risk factors for CHD in women are well documented. 2 Compelling data from epidemiological studies and randomized clinical trials show that CHD is largely preventable.Assessment and management of several risk factors for CHD are cost-effective.3 Despite these facts, there are alarming trends in the prevalence and management of risk factors in women. 2 Smoking rates are declining less for women than for men.The prevalence of obesity is increasing, and Ϸ25% of women report no regular sustained physical activity.4 Approximately 52% of women Ͼ45 years old have elevated blood pressure, and Ϸ40% of women Ͼ55 years old have elevated serum cholesterol.5 The purpose of this statement is to highlight risk factor management strategies that are appropriate for women with a broad range of CHD risk.A more detailed description, including the scientific basis for these recommendations, is available in the 1997 American Heart Association scientific statement "Cardiovascular Disease in Women." 2 Recently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 6 showed clinicians are missing opportunities to prevent CHD.In this study of 29 273 routine office visits, women were counseled less often than men about exercise, nutrition, and weight reduction.In the multicenter Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS), 7 only 10% of women enrolled with documented CHD had baseline LDL-cholesterol levels below a National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) target of 100 mg/dL.A recent national survey showed that women were significantly less likely than men to enroll in cardiac rehabilitation after an acute myocardial infarction (MI) or bypass surgery.8 This finding is especially important because post-MI patients not enrolled in cardiac rehabilitation are less likely to receive aggressive risk factor management.Recommendations for the primary and secondary prevention of CHD have been published.9,10 Although those recommendations apply to women, there are aspects of risk factor management that are unique to women.Pregnancy and the preconception period are optimal times to review a woman's risk factor status and health behaviors to reduce future cardiovascular disease.Pregnant women should be strongly encouraged to discontinue smoking and not to relapse in the postpartum period.Avoidance of excess weight gain duri

Study details

How this study scored 57/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 33 of the 58 points it could be judged on, which is 57 of 100. Total 57 of 100.33 of the 58 points we could judge = 57 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 33 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 57 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Circulation)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1999 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 3 / 4 2,763 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 10318674)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 33 / 58 Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 33 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 57 out of 100.
Total 57 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Mosca, L. J., Grundy, S. M., Judelson, D. R., KATHLEEN B., K. I. N. G., Limacher, M. C., Oparil, S., et al. (1999). Guide to Preventive Cardiology for Women. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2480

Vancouver

Mosca LJ, Grundy SM, Judelson DR, KATHLEEN B. KING, Limacher MC, Oparil S, et al. Guide to Preventive Cardiology for Women. Circulation. 1999. doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2480. PMID: 10318674.

BibTeX

@article{mosca1999-10318674,
  author  = {Mosca, Lori J. and Grundy, Scott M. and Judelson, Debra R. and KATHLEEN B., K. I. N. G. and Limacher, Marian C. and Oparil, Suzanne and Pasternak, Richard C. and Pearson, Thomas A. and others},
  title   = {{Guide to Preventive Cardiology for Women}},
  journal = {Circulation},
  year    = {1999},
  doi     = {10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2480},
  pmid    = {10318674},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.99.18.2480}
}

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also tagged “deaths”

109 studies in the library carry the topic tag “deaths”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 109 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →