Home › Research › Disease mechanisms
Dietary fiber modulates gut microbiota and lipid metabolism ameliorating Alzheimer's pathology in 5xFAD mice
Yuhai Zhao, Christopher M Taylor, Walter J Lukiw, Nicolas G Bazan. Scientific reports, 2025-11-26
Topic: Gut, metabolism and diet
Plain-language summary
The gut-brain axis plays a critical role in maintaining neuronal integrity and influencing the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Here, we investigated how commonly consumed dietary fibers modulate gut microbiota, lipid metabolism, and AD pathology in 5xFAD mice. Male mice were fed either fiber-free (FF) or fiber-plus (FP; 1% cellulose, 2% pectin, 2% inulin) diets for five months, followed by integrated analyses of gut microbiota (16 S rRNA sequencing), fecal lipid metabolites (LC-MS/MS), and neuropathological and behavioral outcomes. FP diets markedly altered microbial composition, characterized by increases in Muribaculaceae, Ileibacterium, and Lachnospiraceae NK4A136 group and reductions in Faecalibaculum and Coriobacteriaceae UCG-002. Fecal lipidomics revealed significant shifts in phospholipids and long-chain fatty acids, while short-chain fatty acid levels showed only modest, taxa-specific changes. Functionally, FP-fed AD mice exhibited reduced amyloid-beta (Aβ) deposition, lower microglial activation, improved microglial morphology, and a decreased cortical and hippocampal Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio. Moreover, FP diets enhanced hippocampal neurogenesis, preserved synaptic protein expression, and improved cognitive performance in object recognition and Y-maze tasks. FP supplementation also mitigated the increased intestinal permeability observed in AD mice. Together, these findings demonstrate that dietary fiber modulates the microbiome-lipid axis and attenuates AD-related pathology through mechanisms extending beyond SCFA production, supporting dietary interventions as a promising strategy for AD prevention and therapy.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Zhao, Y., Taylor, C. M., Lukiw, W. J., & Bazan, N. G. (2025). Dietary fiber modulates gut microbiota and lipid metabolism ameliorating Alzheimer's pathology in 5xFAD mice. Scientific reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26315-3
Vancouver
Zhao Y, Taylor CM, Lukiw WJ, Bazan NG. Dietary fiber modulates gut microbiota and lipid metabolism ameliorating Alzheimer's pathology in 5xFAD mice. Scientific reports. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-26315-3. PMID: 41298902.
BibTeX
@article{zhao2025-41298902,
author = {Zhao, Yuhai and Taylor, Christopher M and Lukiw, Walter J and Bazan, Nicolas G},
title = {{Dietary fiber modulates gut microbiota and lipid metabolism ameliorating Alzheimer's pathology in 5xFAD mice}},
journal = {Scientific reports},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-025-26315-3},
pmid = {41298902},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26315-3}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Fecal lipidomics revealed significant shifts in phospholipids and long-chain fatty acids, while short-chain fatty acid levels showed only modest, taxa-specific changes.
- Together, these findings demonstrate that dietary fiber modulates the microbiome-lipid axis and attenuates AD-related pathology through mechanisms extending beyond SCFA production, supporting dietary interventions as a promising strategy for AD prevention and therapy.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 43/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multicenter collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 43 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific reports) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Laboratory or animal study (title names “5xfad”) — scores zero |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41298902) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 24 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 24 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 43 out of 100. |
| Total | 43 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Disease mechanisms from nearby years
Also tagged “dysbiosis”
173 studies in the library carry the topic tag “dysbiosis”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 173 tagged studies.