Home › Research › Getting a diagnosis
Determinants of dementia risk among older adults with probable sarcopenia and sarcopenia
Nur Indrawaty Lipoeto, Divya Vanoh, Desmawati Desmawati, Wan Rosli Wan Ishak, Rosminah Mohamed. BMC Public Health, 2025-03-25
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Plain-language summary
Probable sarcopenia subjects with dementia were older (68.5(7.8) years old) as compared to those without dementia (66.0(6.0) years old). Among the probable sarcopenia, 66.1% of the subjects with dementia had hypertension, while 64.3% of the sarcopenia subjects had hypertension. Fat mass was significantly higher among dementia subjects with probable sarcopenia (33.0(6.5) %) as compared to non-dementia subjects (30.4(6.8) %). Multivariate analysis revealed that hypertension (OR: 4.049; 95% CI: 1.510; 10.855, p = 0.005) was the only factor associated with dementia risk among older adults with probable sarcopenia and sarcopenia. Hypertension is the only factors associated with risk of dementia after adjusting for potential confounders among older adults with probable sarcopenia and sarcopenia. Good control of blood pressure is essential among sarcopenia patients for lowering risk of dementia. Well-designed clinical trials are essential to investigate optimizing blood pressure level to reduce risk of dementia among patients with sarcopenia and probable sarcopenia.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Lipoeto, N. I., Vanoh, D., Desmawati, D., Ishak, W. R. W., & Mohamed, R. (2025). Determinants of dementia risk among older adults with probable sarcopenia and sarcopenia. BMC Public Health. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22065-z
Vancouver
Lipoeto NI, Vanoh D, Desmawati D, Ishak WRW, Mohamed R. Determinants of dementia risk among older adults with probable sarcopenia and sarcopenia. BMC Public Health. 2025. doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22065-z. PMID: 40133853.
BibTeX
@article{lipoeto2025-40133853,
author = {Lipoeto, Nur Indrawaty and Vanoh, Divya and Desmawati, Desmawati and Ishak, Wan Rosli Wan and Mohamed, Rosminah},
title = {{Determinants of dementia risk among older adults with probable sarcopenia and sarcopenia}},
journal = {BMC Public Health},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1186/s12889-025-22065-z},
pmid = {40133853},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22065-z}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Probable sarcopenia subjects with dementia were older (68.5(7.8) years old) as compared to those without dementia (66.0(6.0) years old).
- Among the probable sarcopenia, 66.1% of the subjects with dementia had hypertension, while 64.3% of the sarcopenia subjects had hypertension.
- Fat mass was significantly higher among dementia subjects with probable sarcopenia (33.0(6.5) %) as compared to non-dementia subjects (30.4(6.8) %).
- Multivariate analysis revealed that hypertension (OR: 4.049; 95% CI: 1.510; 10.855, p = 0.005) was the only factor associated with dementia risk among older adults with probable sarcopenia and sarcopenia.
- Hypertension is the only factors associated with risk of dementia after adjusting for potential confounders among older adults with probable sarcopenia and sarcopenia.
Why it matters
Among older adults with probable sarcopenia or sarcopenia, hypertension was the only factor associated with dementia risk after adjusting for confounders. The authors suggest good blood pressure control may lower dementia risk in these patients, but they call for clinical trials to confirm this.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Getting a diagnosis →
Study details
- Effect size66.1%; 64.3%; OR: 4.049
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 40/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 40 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC Public Health) |
| Journal's citation record | 3 / 4 | BMC Public Health: journal h-index 289 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 3 / 3 | Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 1 / 5 | 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 2 / 6 | Cited 1.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 1 / 4 | Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Rosminah Mohamed holds only 6 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | 0 / 3 | Universiti Sains Malaysia: institution h-index 482 (OpenAlex) |
| Multicenter collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 2 countries |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40133853) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 38 / 96 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 38 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 40 out of 100. |
| Total | 40 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-22065-z
- PubMed: 40133853
- Original source →
- Free full text: BMC Public Health →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Studies this one cites
Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.
Related studies in Getting a diagnosis from nearby years
Also tagged “biobank”
1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.