Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 63 out of 100. Prevention and risk

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Background and purpose Identification of risk factors for dementia after stroke is best performed in comparison with stroke-free controls, because older subjects at high risk for stroke also have a substantial risk of dementia in the absence of stroke. Previous case-control studies were hospital-based. We used a nested case-control design to prospectively evaluate these risk factors in the community-based Framingham Study cohort. Methods We compared 212 subjects who were free of dementia in January 1982 and sustained a first stroke after this date, with 1060 age- and sex-matched, stroke- and dementia-free controls. We calculated 10-year risks of dementia (by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Volume IV criteria) developing in cases and controls and also estimated the hazard ratios within subgroups defined by exposure to various demographic factors (age, gender, education), stroke-related features (right or left hemisphere, stroke type, second stroke), stroke risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, atrial fibrillation, smoking) and apolipoprotein E genotype. Results Dementia developed in 19.3% of cases and 11.0% of controls. Baseline stroke doubled the risk of dementia (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5 to 3.1) and adjustment for age, sex, education, and exposure to individual stroke risk factors did not diminish the risk (HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.6 to 3.7). The HR was higher in younger subjects (age younger than 80 years [HR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.5 to 4.5]), apolipoprotein E 3/3 homozygotes (HR: 3.4; 95% CI: 2.0 to 5.8), and high school graduates (HR: 2.4; 95% CI: 1.5 to 3.9). Conclusions Stroke increases a subject's risk of dementia as compared with age- and sex-matched controls. Primary and secondary prevention of stroke should significantly decrease the risk of all dementia.

Key findings

Why it matters

In the community-based Framingham Study, stroke doubled the risk of dementia compared with age- and sex-matched controls, and dementia developed in 19.3% of cases versus 11.0% of controls. The authors conclude that primary and secondary prevention of stroke should significantly decrease the risk of all dementia, which is a prevention implication rather than a treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 63/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 6 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 2 of 4; Effect reported 3 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 63 of 100.63 of 100 points earned37 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a case-control study. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Stroke)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Stroke: journal h-index 455 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 6 / 12 A case-control study
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2004 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 2 / 4 212 participants
Effect reported 3 / 3 Effect reported with a statistic (interval, p-value, ratio or similar)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 370 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 15.4 citations a year over 24 year(s) since 2004
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 12.2× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 28 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 39 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Philip A. Wolf: h-index 149 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Boston University: institution h-index 1,456 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 15118167)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 63 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Ivan, C. S., Seshadri, S., Beiser, A., Au, R., Kase, C. S., Kelly-Hayes, M., et al. (2004). Dementia after stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000127810.92616.78

Vancouver

Ivan CS, Seshadri S, Beiser A, Au R, Kase CS, Kelly-Hayes M, et al. Dementia after stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 2004. doi:10.1161/01.str.0000127810.92616.78. PMID: 15118167.

BibTeX

@article{ivan2004-15118167,
  author  = {Ivan, C. S. and Seshadri, S. and Beiser, A. and Au, R. and Kase, C. S. and Kelly-Hayes, M. and Wolf, P. A.},
  title   = {{Dementia after stroke: the Framingham Study}},
  journal = {Stroke},
  year    = {2004},
  doi     = {10.1161/01.str.0000127810.92616.78},
  pmid    = {15118167},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.0000127810.92616.78}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

28 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Prevention and risk

Also tagged “prevalence”

1,224 studies in the library carry the topic tag “prevalence”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,224 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Prevention and risk

See all studies in Prevention and risk →