Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Deep learning detection of informative features in tau PET for Alzheimer’s disease classification
Taeho Jo, Kwangsik T. Nho, Shannon L. Risacher, Andrew J. Saykin, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. BMC Bioinformatics, 2020-12-01
Topic: Plasma and spinal-fluid biomarkers
Background Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common type of dementia, typically characterized by memory loss followed by progressive cognitive decline and functional impairment. Many clinical trials of potential therapies for AD have failed, and there is currently no approved disease-modifying treatment. Biomarkers for early detection and mechanistic understanding of disease course are critical for drug development and clinical trials. Amyloid has been the focus of most biomarker research. Here, we developed a deep learning-based framework to identify informative features for AD classification using tau positron emission tomography (PET) scans. Methods We analysed [ 18 F]flortaucipir PET image data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. We first developed an image classifier to distinguish AD from cognitively normal (CN) older adults by training a 3D convolutional neural network (CNN)-based deep learning model on tau PET images (N=132; 66 CN and 66 AD), then applied the classifier to images from individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI; N=168). In addition, we applied a layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP)-based model to identify informative features and to visualize classification results. We compared these results with those from whole brain voxel-wise between-group analysis using conventional Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12). Results The 3D CNN-based classification model of AD from CN yielded an average accuracy of 90.8% based on five-fold cross-validation. The LRP model identified the brain regions in tau PET images that contributed most to the AD classification from CN. The top identified regions included the hippocampus, parahippocampus, thalamus, and fusiform. The LRP results were consistent with those from the voxel-wise analysis in SPM12, showing significant focal AD associated regional tau deposition in the bilateral temporal lobes including the entorhinal cortex. The AD probability scores calculated by the classifier were correlated with brain tau deposition in the medial temporal lobe in MCI participants (r=0.43 for early MCI and r=0.49 for late MCI). Conclusion A deep learning framework combining 3D CNN and LRP algorithms can be used with tau PET images to identify informative features for AD classification and may have application for early detection during prodromal stages of AD.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Jo, T., Nho, K. T., Risacher, S. L., Saykin, A. J., & Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. (2020). Deep learning detection of informative features in tau PET for Alzheimer’s disease classification. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-03848-0
Vancouver
Jo T, Nho KT, Risacher SL, Saykin AJ, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Deep learning detection of informative features in tau PET for Alzheimer’s disease classification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2020. doi:10.1186/s12859-020-03848-0. PMID: 33371874.
BibTeX
@article{jo2020-33371874,
author = {Jo, Taeho and Nho, Kwangsik T. and Risacher, Shannon L. and Saykin, Andrew J. and {Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative}},
title = {{Deep learning detection of informative features in tau PET for Alzheimer’s disease classification}},
journal = {BMC Bioinformatics},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1186/s12859-020-03848-0},
pmid = {33371874},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-020-03848-0}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- In addition, we applied a layer-wise relevance propagation (LRP)-based model to identify informative features and to visualize classification results.
- We compared these results with those from whole brain voxel-wise between-group analysis using conventional Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM12).
- Results The 3D CNN-based classification model of AD from CN yielded an average accuracy of 90.8% based on five-fold cross-validation.
- The LRP results were consistent with those from the voxel-wise analysis in SPM12, showing significant focal AD associated regional tau deposition in the bilateral temporal lobes including the entorhinal cortex.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Participants132
- Effect size90.8%
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 57/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 33 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 57 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (BMC Bioinformatics) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 2 / 4 | 132 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33371874) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 33 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 33 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 57 out of 100. |
| Total | 57 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Brain scans and imaging
Also tagged “convolutional”
205 studies in the library carry the topic tag “convolutional”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 205 tagged studies.