Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Longitudinal Structural MRI-Based Deep Learning And Radiomics Features For Predicting Alzheimer\\\\\\\'s Disease Progression
Diksha Pawar, Jayshree Boaddh, Prof. Rahul Patidar. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2026-01-01
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Alzheimer\\\'s disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia worldwide, affects more than 55 million individuals and gen-erates annual healthcare costs exceeding two trillion USD [14]. A substantial proportion (30–40% per year) of pa-tients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) progress to AD [2], making early and accurate prognostication essential for timely intervention, trial enrichment, and resource allocation. This paper presents a comprehensive review of a re-cent longitudinal MRI-based study by Aghajanian et al. [1], which integrates three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural networks (CNNs), time-aware long short-term memory (T-LSTM) networks with attention mechanisms, and radiomics features to predict MCI-to-AD conversion using structural MRI. The cohort comprises 228 ADNI MCI participants with at least three T1-weighted MRI scans over an 18-month window (684 scans in total) [1]. A 3D Res-Net-18 backbone [9] extracts volumetric features, fed into a T-LSTM incorporating inter-scan intervals and attention mechanisms [10]. The best longitudinal model achieves a concordance index (c-index) of 0.90, with time-specific AUCs of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.89 for 2-, 3-, and 5-year conversion prediction, respectively, and an approximate 11-fold hazard ratio between high- and low-risk groups [1]. This review analyzes the methodology, highlights its strengths and weaknesses, and discusses key implications for clinical translation.
Key findings
- This paper presents a comprehensive review of a re-cent longitudinal MRI-based study by Aghajanian et al. [1], which integrates three-dimensional (3D) convolutional neural networks (CNNs), time-aware long short-term memory (T-LSTM) networks with attention mechanisms, and radiomics features to predic
- The cohort comprises 228 ADNI MCI participants with at least three T1-weighted MRI scans over an 18-month window (684 scans in total) [1].
- A 3D Res-Net-18 backbone [9] extracts volumetric features, fed into a T-LSTM incorporating inter-scan intervals and attention mechanisms [10].
- The best longitudinal model achieves a concordance index (c-index) of 0.90, with time-specific AUCs of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.89 for 2-, 3-, and 5-year conversion prediction, respectively, and an approximate 11-fold hazard ratio between high- and low-risk groups [1].
- This review analyzes the methodology, highlights its strengths and weaknesses, and discusses key implications for clinical translation.
Why it matters
A reviewed longitudinal MRI study using 3D CNNs, T-LSTM networks, and radiomics predicted MCI-to-AD conversion with a c-index of 0.90 and time-specific AUCs of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.89 for 2-, 3-, and 5-year prediction. This is a prediction and prognostication tool, not a treatment, cure, or prevention.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Study designlongitudinal study
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 55/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 35 of the 64 points we could judge it on, which is 55 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A longitudinal study following the same people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 35 / 64 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 35 of the 64 points we could judge it on is 55 out of 100. |
| Total | 55 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Pawar, D., Boaddh, J., & Patidar, P. R. (2026). Longitudinal Structural MRI-Based Deep Learning And Radiomics Features For Predicting Alzheimer\\\\\\\'s Disease Progression. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18620944
Vancouver
Pawar D, Boaddh J, Patidar PR. Longitudinal Structural MRI-Based Deep Learning And Radiomics Features For Predicting Alzheimer\\\\\\\'s Disease Progression. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.18620944.
BibTeX
@article{pawar2026-612ec977,
author = {Pawar, Diksha and Boaddh, Jayshree and Patidar, Prof. Rahul},
title = {{Longitudinal Structural MRI-Based Deep Learning And Radiomics Features For Predicting Alzheimer's Disease Progression}},
journal = {Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.18620944},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18620944}
}