Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Deep Learning Framework for Characterizing Tau‐PET Spatial Heterogeneity along AD Spectrum: A Self‐supervised Approach
Theyaneshwaran Jayaprakash, Connor Lee Cornelison, Plamena P. Powla, Lu Zhang, Carolyn A. Fredericks, Andrew J. Saykin, Selena Wang. Alzheimer s & Dementia, 2025-12-01
Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models
Three robustly differentiated AD subtypes (S1, S2, and S3) were identified, with 93% validation accuracy and Adjusted Mutual Information scores >0.89, each exhibiting distinct tau patterns. S1 showed minimal transentorhinal/temporal pole tau accumulation, S2 had increased medial temporal/posterior parietal tau binding, and S3 demonstrated widespread cortical tau accumulation (see Figure 1). Cross-sectional analysis revealed significantly higher whole-brain tau accumulation (TAU_bl) in S2 than S1 (p <0.001). Cognitive assessments revealed domain specific deficits: memory impairment (RAVLT_immediate_bl) from S1 to S2, language deficits (LDELTOTAL_bl) from S2 to S3, and more severe overall cognitive impairment (MMSE_bl) from S1 to S3. Patient-reported measures remained stable, while study partner assessments indicated greater impairment in memory (EcogSPMem_bl), planning (EcogSPPlan_bl), and organizational (EcogSPOrgan_bl) skills in S3 than S2. Two significant functional connectivity differences were identified between S2 and S3 (see Figure 2) based on non-overlapping 95% credible intervals: Cross Hemispheric connection (right lateral orbitofrontal to left superior temporal) and Default Mode Network connection (right pars orbitalis to right isthmus cingulate). This study leveraged tau-PET data to identify spatial heterogeneity in AD. Multimodal analyses highlighted anatomical, cognitive, and functional connectivity differences between subtypes, emphasizing the potential of deep learning models to explore AD pathology.
Key findings
- Three robustly differentiated AD subtypes (S1, S2, and S3) were identified, with 93% validation accuracy and Adjusted Mutual Information scores >0.89, each exhibiting distinct tau patterns.
- S1 showed minimal transentorhinal/temporal pole tau accumulation, S2 had increased medial temporal/posterior parietal tau binding, and S3 demonstrated widespread cortical tau accumulation (see Figure 1).
- Cross-sectional analysis revealed significantly higher whole-brain tau accumulation (TAU_bl) in S2 than S1 (p <0.001).
- Cognitive assessments revealed domain specific deficits: memory impairment (RAVLT_immediate_bl) from S1 to S2, language deficits (LDELTOTAL_bl) from S2 to S3, and more severe overall cognitive impairment (MMSE_bl) from S1 to S3.
- Patient-reported measures remained stable, while study partner assessments indicated greater impairment in memory (EcogSPMem_bl), planning (EcogSPPlan_bl), and organizational (EcogSPOrgan_bl) skills in S3 than S2.
Why it matters
A self-supervised deep learning approach identified three AD subtypes with distinct tau-PET patterns and different cognitive deficits, with 93% validation accuracy. This describes disease heterogeneity for classification, not a treatment, cure, or prevention.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Study designcross-sectional
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 37/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a snapshot of people at one point in time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer s & Dementia) |
| Journal's citation record | 2 / 4 | Alzheimer s & Dementia: journal h-index 228 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 4 / 12 | A snapshot of people at one point in time |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 4 / 5 | 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 0 / 7 | Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025 |
| Impact for its field and year | 0 / 6 | Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Selena Wang: h-index 7 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 2 / 3 | Yale University: institution h-index 1,927 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 2 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41433750) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Total | 37 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
- DOI: 10.1002/alz70862_109949
- PubMed: 41433750
- Original source →
- Free full text: Alzheimer s & Dementia →
Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Jayaprakash, T., Cornelison, C. L., Powla, P. P., Zhang, L., Fredericks, C. A., Saykin, A. J., et al. (2025). Deep Learning Framework for Characterizing Tau‐PET Spatial Heterogeneity along AD Spectrum: A Self‐supervised Approach. Alzheimer s & Dementia. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70862_109949
Vancouver
Jayaprakash T, Cornelison CL, Powla PP, Zhang L, Fredericks CA, Saykin AJ, et al. Deep Learning Framework for Characterizing Tau‐PET Spatial Heterogeneity along AD Spectrum: A Self‐supervised Approach. Alzheimer s & Dementia. 2025. doi:10.1002/alz70862_109949. PMID: 41433750.
BibTeX
@article{jayaprakash2025-41433750,
author = {Jayaprakash, Theyaneshwaran and Cornelison, Connor Lee and Powla, Plamena P. and Zhang, Lu and Fredericks, Carolyn A. and Saykin, Andrew J. and Wang, Selena},
title = {{Deep Learning Framework for Characterizing Tau‐PET Spatial Heterogeneity along AD Spectrum: A Self‐supervised Approach}},
journal = {Alzheimer s \& Dementia},
year = {2025},
doi = {10.1002/alz70862_109949},
pmid = {41433750},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70862_109949}
}