Home › Research › Brain scans and imaging
Interpretable Frequency-Aware Deep Learning for Multi-Class EEG Classification of Neurological Disorders
Bunterngchit C, Baniata LH, Baniata MH, Atwan JM, Alali M, Alsharaiah MA, Kang S.. Preprints.org, 2026-10-12
Topic: Brain imaging, connectivity and assessment
Electroencephalography (EEG) records cortical activity with high temporal resolution without radiation and at low cost, which makes it a practical signal for automated screening of neurological disorders. Deep learning classifies EEG with high accuracy, but most models distinguish only two conditions and give no account of their decisions, which limits their use in screening and decision support. This paper presents SpectraXAI, an interpretable frequency-aware deep learning model that assigns resting-state EEG to four diagnostic categories: Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, schizophrenia, and healthy control. The model filters each EEG window into the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands and processes every band in a separate convolutional branch with squeeze-and-excitation recalibration. Softmax-weighted band attention and temporal attention then combine the spectral and temporal evidence, and the same attention weights are intrinsic explanations of each prediction. Under a subject-disjoint evaluation protocol that prevents window leakage, the model reached 94.43% accuracy, 96.74% balanced accuracy, and 93.82% macro-F1 on 20,760 windows from 173 unseen subjects while using only 0.10 million parameters. An ablation study confirmed that the attention modules account for most of the improvement over a plain convolutional baseline. Attention weights, feature-attention heatmaps, Grad-CAM, and t-SNE embeddings trace each decision to specific frequency bands, time segments, and learned features, therefore the frequency structure that drives the accuracy also makes the predictions inspectable.
Key findings
- The model filters each EEG window into the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands and processes every band in a separate convolutional branch with squeeze-and-excitation recalibration.
- Softmax-weighted band attention and temporal attention then combine the spectral and temporal evidence, and the same attention weights are intrinsic explanations of each prediction.
- Under a subject-disjoint evaluation protocol that prevents window leakage, the model reached 94.43% accuracy, 96.74% balanced accuracy, and 93.82% macro-F1 on 20,760 windows from 173 unseen subjects while using only 0.10 million parameters.
- An ablation study confirmed that the attention modules account for most of the improvement over a plain convolutional baseline.
- Attention weights, feature-attention heatmaps, Grad-CAM, and t-SNE embeddings trace each decision to specific frequency bands, time segments, and learned features, therefore the frequency structure that drives the accuracy also makes the predictions inspectable.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Effect size94.43%; 96.74%; 93.82%
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 16/100
Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. It scored 24 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 15 of the 62 points we could judge it on, which is 24 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 2 / 10 | Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Preprints.org) |
| Journal's citation record | 0 / 4 | Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 4 / 10 | Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed. Hosted on a preprint server. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 15 / 62 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 15 of the 62 points we could judge it on is 24 out of 100. |
| Total | 24 / 100 | Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article. |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 7 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Bunterngchit, C., Baniata, L. H., Baniata, M. H., Atwan, J. M., Alali, M., Alsharaiah, M. A., et al. (2026). Interpretable Frequency-Aware Deep Learning for Multi-Class EEG Classification of Neurological Disorders. Preprints.org. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.1078.v1
Vancouver
Bunterngchit C, Baniata LH, Baniata MH, Atwan JM, Alali M, Alsharaiah MA, et al. Interpretable Frequency-Aware Deep Learning for Multi-Class EEG Classification of Neurological Disorders. Preprints.org. 2026. doi:10.20944/preprints202610.1078.v1.
BibTeX
@article{bunterngchit2026-e6cbac35,
author = {Bunterngchit, C. and Baniata, L. H. and Baniata, M. H. and Atwan, J. M. and Alali, M. and Alsharaiah, M. A. and Kang, S.},
title = {{Interpretable Frequency-Aware Deep Learning for Multi-Class EEG Classification of Neurological Disorders}},
journal = {Preprints.org},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.20944/preprints202610.1078.v1},
url = {https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.1078.v1}
}