Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

INTRODUCTION: Optimal sleep duration is increasingly recognized as an important determinant of overall health, including cognitive functioning. Studies often report a U- or J-shaped relationship between sleep duration and incident dementia or cognitive deterioration, whereas long sleep, the extremes of sleep duration, and the transition to long sleep were particularly detrimental. In preclinical studies, partial or complete sleep deprivation produced inflammation, oxidative stress, as well as increased tau hyperphosphorylation and amyloid-β burden. In humans, although the findings are less pronounced, they still highlight that transitioning to an excessive sleep duration is associated with neurodegeneration. Moreover, the association between sleep duration and dementia is complex and modified by genetic, psychosocial and lifestyle factors, along with psychiatric and somatic comorbidities. AREAS COVERED: The purpose of this perspective is to summarize the current knowledge on the association between sleep duration and dementia. It is based on a literature search for meta-analyses of prospective studies with sleep duration as an exposure and dementia as an outcome. EXPERT OPINION: Sleep duration is a modifiable risk factor for dementia while long sleep may be an early sign of neurodegeneration. Therefore, self-reported sleep duration is an easy-to-use tool for detecting individuals who may be at risk for cognitive deterioration.

Key findings

Why it matters

This perspective summarizes evidence that sleep duration is a modifiable risk factor for dementia, with long sleep possibly being an early sign of neurodegeneration. It suggests self-reported sleep duration could be an easy detection tool, but does not show that changing sleep prevents dementia.

Study details

How this study scored 50/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 12 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 50 of 100.50 of 100 points earned50 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a meta-analysis pooling many studies. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported and studied in people because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics: journal h-index 125 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 12 / 12 A meta-analysis pooling many studies
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 A review of other studies — randomisation is not credited here
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 3 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.9× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 3 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Nela Pivac: h-index 45 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 University of Zagreb: institution h-index 438 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 5 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40369950)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 50 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Šagud, M., Janović, M. B., Uzun, S., Rajačić, B. K., Kozumplik, O., & Pivac, N. (2025). Could self-reporting sleep duration become an important tool in the prediction of dementia? Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2506459

Vancouver

Šagud M, Janović MB, Uzun S, Rajačić BK, Kozumplik O, Pivac N. Could self-reporting sleep duration become an important tool in the prediction of dementia? Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. 2025. doi:10.1080/14737175.2025.2506459. PMID: 40369950.

BibTeX

@article{sagud2025-40369950,
  author  = {Šagud, Marina and Janović, Maja Bajs and Uzun, Suzana and Rajačić, Biljana Kosanović and Kozumplik, Oliver and Pivac, Nela},
  title   = {{Could self-reporting sleep duration become an important tool in the prediction of dementia?}},
  journal = {Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1080/14737175.2025.2506459},
  pmid    = {40369950},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2025.2506459}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Risk factors

Also tagged “biobank”

1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →