Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 60 out of 100. Cognitive tests and assessment

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

In mostly small single-center studies, Alzheimer's disease (AD) is associated with characteristic and progressive reductions in fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) measurements of the regional cerebral metabolic rate for glucose (CMRgl). The AD Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) is acquiring FDG PET, volumetric magnetic resonance imaging, and other biomarker measurements in a large longitudinal multi-center study of initially mildly affected probable AD (pAD) patients, amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) patients, who are at increased AD risk, and cognitively normal controls (NC), and we are responsible for analyzing the PET images using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Here we compare baseline CMRgl measurements from 74 pAD patients and 142 aMCI patients to those from 82 NC, we correlate CMRgl with categorical and continuous measures of clinical disease severity

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Langbaum, J. B., Chen, K., Lee, W., Reschke, C., Bandy, D., Fleisher, A. S., et al. (2009). Categorical and correlational analyses of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography images from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). NeuroImage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.072

Vancouver

Langbaum JB, Chen K, Lee W, Reschke C, Bandy D, Fleisher AS, et al. Categorical and correlational analyses of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography images from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). NeuroImage. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.072. PMID: 19349228.

BibTeX

@article{langbaum2009-19349228,
  author  = {Langbaum, J. B. and Chen, K. and Lee, W. and Reschke, C. and Bandy, D. and Fleisher, A. S. and Alexander, G. E. and Foster, N. L. and others},
  title   = {{Categorical and correlational analyses of baseline fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography images from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)}},
  journal = {NeuroImage},
  year    = {2009},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.072},
  pmid    = {19349228},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.072}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Using baseline FDG PET images from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, this study compared cerebral glucose metabolism in 74 probable Alzheimer's disease patients and 142 amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients with 82 cognitively normal controls. It is a biomarker and imaging analysis, not a treatment, cure or prevention study.

Study details

How this study scored 60/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 5 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 2 of 4; Senior author's track record 4 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 60 of 100.60 of 100 points earned40 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (NeuroImage)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 NeuroImage: journal h-index 523 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2009 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 5 / 7 Cited 281 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 14.8 citations a year over 19 year(s) since 2009
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 16.8× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 14 other studies in this library
Still being cited 2 / 4 Cited 24 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 4 / 4 Last-listed author Eric M. Reiman: h-index 151 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 University of Michigan: institution h-index 2,240 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 11 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 19349228)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 60 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here. Showing 12 of 20.

Later studies that cite this one

14 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Cognitive tests and assessment

Also tagged “machine”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “machine”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Cognitive tests and assessment

See all studies in Cognitive tests and assessment →