Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 53 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Twenty-one patients with a clinical diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer's type (DAT) and 29 healthy, age-matched controls were studied using positron emission tomography (PET) and [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose to measure regional cerebral glucose consumption in the resting state. Reductions in ratio measures of relative metabolism in some parietal, temporal, and frontal regions were found in mild, moderate, and severe DAT groups. A significant increase in right/left metabolic asymmetry, particularly in parietal regions, also was seen in mild and moderate groups. Only in the severely demented patients was the absolute cerebral metabolic rate reduced significantly from control values. Fourteen patients had repeated PET studies, but only those patients with moderate to severe dementia showed a decline in IQ over 6 to 15 months. There were no significant changes in metabolic measures over time. PET is useful in quantifying regional cerebral dysfunction in DAT, even in the early stages of the disease.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Duara, R., Grady, C., Haxby, J., Sundaram, M., Cutler, N. R., Heston, L., et al. (1986). Positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.36.7.879

Vancouver

Duara R, Grady C, Haxby J, Sundaram M, Cutler NR, Heston L, et al. Positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's disease. Neurology. 1986. doi:10.1212/wnl.36.7.879. PMID: 3487046.

BibTeX

@article{duara1986-3487046,
  author  = {Duara, R. and Grady, C. and Haxby, J. and Sundaram, M. and Cutler, N. R. and Heston, L. and Moore, A. and Schlageter, N. and others},
  title   = {{Positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Neurology},
  year    = {1986},
  doi     = {10.1212/wnl.36.7.879},
  pmid    = {3487046},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.36.7.879}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

PET scans showed reduced metabolism in certain brain regions and increased right-left differences even in mild Alzheimer's disease, but these metabolic measures did not change over time in followed patients. This means PET can help show regional brain dysfunction early, but it did not track worsening of the disease in this study.

Study details

How this study scored 53/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 3 of 5; Impact for its field and year 5 of 6; Cited by studies here 3 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 53 of 100.53 of 100 points earned47 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Neurology)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 Neurology: journal h-index 525 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1986 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 568 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 3 / 5 13.5 citations a year over 42 year(s) since 1986
Impact for its field and year 5 / 6 Cited 27.7× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 3 / 6 Cited by 17 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author С. И. Рапопорт: h-index 67 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 National Institutes of Health: institution h-index 2,723 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 3487046)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 53 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Later studies that cite this one

17 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Also tagged “machine”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “machine”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →