Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 57 out of 100. Getting a diagnosis

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

We observed high levels of missing data in most cognitive test items - on average 13% and as high as 65%. Low fluency in spoken Mandarin, illiteracy, and impairments in hearing and vision were each associated with greater odds of missingness on nearly all tests. Partly because of differential missingness, there was minimal evidence of DIF by these features in items in which we expected a priori to find DIF (e.g., repetition of a spoken phrase among those with hearing impairment). Several cognitive test items exhibited statistically significant DIF, however there was minimal evidence of meaningful DIF. Differential missingness in cognitive items by spoken language, literacy, and sensory impairments is potentially more of an inferential threat than measurement differences in test items.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study found high levels of missing cognitive test data in a large survey, with missingness linked to language fluency, literacy, and sensory impairments. It highlights that differential missingness is a potential threat to drawing conclusions from cognitive assessments, rather than reporting a treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 57/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 3 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 2 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 3 of 6; Cited by studies here 2 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 2 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 57 of 100.57 of 100 points earned43 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Aging Clinical and Experimental Research)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Aging Clinical and Experimental Research: journal h-index 125 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 3 / 5 Rated “moderate” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 9,755 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 2 / 7 Cited 7 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 2.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 3 / 6 Cited 4.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 2 / 6 Cited by 3 other studies in this library
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 7 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Lindsay C. Kobayashi: h-index 39 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 2 / 3 Johns Hopkins University: institution h-index 2,306 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 6 institution(s) in 2 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 40355654)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 57 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 8 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Gross, A. L., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y. S., Zhao, Y., Li, C., Meijer, E., et al. (2025). Language, literacy, and sensory impairments and missing cognitive test scores in the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y

Vancouver

Gross AL, Liu Y, Zhang YS, Zhao Y, Li C, Meijer E, et al. Language, literacy, and sensory impairments and missing cognitive test scores in the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research. 2025. doi:10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y. PMID: 40355654.

BibTeX

@article{gross2025-40355654,
  author  = {Gross, Alden L. and Liu, Ying and Zhang, Yuan S and Zhao, Yaohui and Li, Chihua and Meijer, Erik and Lee, Jinkook and Kobayashi, Lindsay C.},
  title   = {{Language, literacy, and sensory impairments and missing cognitive test scores in the Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study}},
  journal = {Aging Clinical and Experimental Research},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y},
  pmid    = {40355654},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-025-03039-y}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

3 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Getting a diagnosis

Similar studies

More on Getting a diagnosis

See all studies in Getting a diagnosis →